The list of known side-effects resulting from the Pfizer Clinical Trials.
No. 152
34k isnât a large enough number for this to happen naturally
Try telling to the experts that know what they are talking about.
Iâll get right on thatâŚ
Reposting misinformation wonât suddenly make it correct. If the promoters of the misinformation had half a brain they would have read one of the first paragraphs.
An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication.
They would also have looked at the list and asked how the fuck event 366 took place, death neonatal when no babies were vaccinated, 370 de javu lol, 396 dreamy state, 402 eclampsia when no pregnant women were vaccinated, 435 epilepsy surgery, 448 exposure to Sars Cov 2, 470 1. Foetal placental thrombosis again no pregnant women vaccinated, 655 1. Infantile genetic agranulocytosis when no kids vaccinated yet, 656 Infantile genetic agranulocytosis but no babies vaccinated, 760 to 762 manufacturing issues lol, 778 Mers Cov test negative lol, 1092 1. SARS-CoV-2 antibody test negative.
Basically itâs just a list of events to look out for and some that were reported but as yet not associated with the vaccine, they sift out the chaff and then look into the real events and compare them with the rate in the general public and as each section highlights there were no signals raised.
You can cross reference them off your own link. APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST 1p36deletion syndrome - Pastebin.com
The list of known side-effects resulting from the Pfizer Clinical Trials.
Dangerous side effect number 152 refers to the latest âMonkey Poxâ outbreak.
There are another 1200+ dangerous and deadly side effects which were known to both the government and Pfizer.
No. 152
And yet their data still shows the unvaccinated dying, being admitted to ICU and cases by ratio in higher numbers. Are you ever going to admit it debunks your opinion? https://www.covid19data.com.au/vaccination-status
snowy youâre still a thing?
What a bunch of self-serving morality right thereâŚDonât complain about never getting your money, complain and youâll never get your moneyâŚ
Did you read it? 2-doses and 3-doses both have more deaths than the unvaccinatedâŚ
Look up base rates.
No
Iâll help you out. Here is a picture showing vaccinated on the left and unvaccinated on the right, each group has two deaths, using common sense what one has the higher ratio of deaths?
Are you claiming those are the death rates?
debate is over i guess
THe data shows roughly 70% of the population has at least 2 doses and 70% of the deaths are from people with at least 2 dosesâŚ
Duhh, itâs an example what base rates look like.
Have a look at the actual vaccination status, 97.8% at least one dose, 96.2% at least two doses and 71.4% at least 3 doses. Simple ratios still show the unvaccinated dying, admitted to ICU and cases being higher.
https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/numbers-statistics