I didn't understand the original post or the new edited one, seems like you're the biased one.
Posted by mistake app was playing up, just ignore it. I dont have a bias towards either, I just have a bug bear of people trying to pass off their opinion as some kind of fact.
I didn't understand the original post or the new edited one, seems like you're the biased one.
Posted by mistake app was playing up, just ignore it. I dont have a bias towards either, I just have a bug bear of people trying to pass off their opinion as some kind of fact.
It is a fact that grapplers have more success against Anderson than strikers.
I didn't understand the original post or the new edited one, seems like you're the biased one.
Posted by mistake app was playing up, just ignore it. I dont have a bias towards either, I just have a bug bear of people trying to pass off their opinion as some kind of fact.
It is a fact that grapplers have more success against Anderson than strikers.
Grapplers such as Maia, Marquardt, Chael, Okami... Those kind of grapplers? Or a different kind of grappler?
I didn't understand the original post or the new edited one, seems like you're the biased one.
Posted by mistake app was playing up, just ignore it. I dont have a bias towards either, I just have a bug bear of people trying to pass off their opinion as some kind of fact.
It is a fact that grapplers have more success against Anderson than strikers.
Grapplers such as Maia, Marquardt, Chael, Okami... Those kind of grapplers? Or a different kind of grappler?
Of the few rounds Anderson has lost in the past bunch of fights was he out struck or wrestled?
Wrestled, you win. I agree that without anything to suggest that Weidman is on the level of previous failed opponents, he will pose a far greater threat than Bisping. Happy?