I have a friend who is a LEO in CA. A couple of months ago, he bought (through gunbroker or some other online auction) a revolver which is not legal to own in CA unless you are a LEO. The transaction went smoothly and transfer to CA was fine until a couple of days ago when his transfer agent here in CA said that he needed a signature or something from his C/O stating that he was going to carry it as a on-duty weapon in order to own it or something like that (obviously he is not going to carry a 30 year old revolver as a duty weapon). I told him he didn't need to do that based on this (right?):
-----
http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/exemptpo.php
Effective immediately, peace officers who have legislative authority to carry and use firearms may, without a letter signed by the head of their agency or the agency head's designee, purchase non-rostered handguns and/or large capacity magazines. The peace officer must present a valid peace officer identification card and the dealer must retain a copy of the identification card on file. (PC 12132 & 12133). A letter is still required from the head of the agency to exempt the peace officer from the ten day waiting period. (PC 12078).
-----
Am I right? Or is illegal for him to own this without a letter?