Durham investigation, done?

So I've seen bunch of people on the forum and being insinuated in the media that the Durham probe is probably done and he was useless because the only charge brought forward was a guilty plea discovered by the IG horrowitz. 

I first read the statement of offense and thought damn no hint. then I read the plea deal. At first I didnt notice this gem in the plea deal

Someone else has pointed this out

Is anyone familiar with U.S.S.G. 1B1.8(a) and (b)?

If I'm interpreting that correctly clinesmith gave them information on others that they either had insufficient evidence to prove or that they did not know. 

Who did he roll on?

https://mobile.twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1298814057642942470

Is this MAGA or not MAGA? Too lazy to read.

1 Like

From the man himself. 

https://mobile.twitter.com/codyave/status/1299069981506719744

if I recall correctly he was actually the first one to state this in one of his letters. 

 

I’ll look for it and post

SergesBeefyHopeFlaps - Is this MAGA or not MAGA? Too lazy to read.

It's good news. 

 

basically his plea agreement basically says he gave up information on unlawful activity on others that the govt didn’t have the evidence to prove. 

 

so expect more indictments 

2 Likes

In

In

SpunQ -

Good spot.

Not my spot but twitter has some intelligent people out there. 

NoNeed4aScreenName -

From the man himself. 

https://mobile.twitter.com/codyave/status/1299069981506719744

if I recall correctly he was actually the first one to state this in one of his letters. 

 

I’ll look for it and post

Carters 2016 letter to OSCE. 

 

accurately calls out Hillary for America for his smears in the media. On another page he says normally he would go to authorities in the U.S. but Clinton seems to have some pull there lol

![](upload://eGEHV9EVYsrVfResVXSPWC9BH7j.jpeg)

Spunq you might like this..... carter page knows 

https://mobile.twitter.com/codyave/status/1299137095194177537

And he was always on point and way ahead of everyone else....

Here’s my question. WTF is this Cambridge 4 thing I saw talked about only once on TV? Because if it’s 4 intelligence guys in Cambridge colluding with Mi6 agent Steele then isn’t it really English interference in our election not Russian? 

 

https://larouchepub.com/pr/2020/20200810_cambridge4.html

Aug. 10, 2020 (EIRNS)—Steven P. Schrage is a former George W. Bush government official and present consultant, who wrote “The Spies Who Hijacked America” on investigative journalist Matt Taibbi’s blog on Aug. 9. Schrage means British spies, whom he calls “the Cambridge Four” and compares to “the Cambridge Five” of Kim Philby, Guy Burgess, Anthony Blunt, Donald Maclean, John Cairncross; and whom he calls the movers both for the firing of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as National Security Adviser and for the entire “Russiagate” coup drive against President Donald Trump. Schrage makes clear he is providing information to the investigative counsel U.S. Attorney John Durham appointed by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the intelligence services in “Russiagate.”

SpunQ -

https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1299131137890177024

only now seeing this

I've been saying it for awhile. Pientka flipped.

i can post some documents that were released that show an employee was retaliated against after he told the IG about a superiors ethics violations. 

 

All happened around the the time pientka was moved to San francisco

NoNeed4aScreenName -
SpunQ -

https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1299131137890177024

only now seeing this

I've been saying it for awhile. Pientka flipped.

i can post some documents that were released that show an employee was retaliated against after he told the IG about a superiors ethics violations. 

 

All happened around the the time pientka was moved to San francisco

 

Old techno fog is getting it wrong. He wasn't promoted....

https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1216155806292434945

SpunQ -
JJitsu -

Here’s my question. WTF is this Cambridge 4 thing I saw talked about only once on TV? Because if it’s 4 intelligence guys in Cambridge colluding with Mi6 agent Steele then isn’t it really English interference in our election not Russian? 

Five eyes, UK spies on USA and vice versa. Intel sharing = skirt the law. There are also upstream providers who do the same thing though .

Yea but the “official” story is it’s one ex Mi6 agent gone rogue. Where did these other 4 assholes come from!? Are they trying to keep it Russia because maybe we’d get ridiculously pissed if we thought it was the English? 

I want to believe something will happen. But I really doubt it. To many people left and right could be exposed. 

JJitsu -

Here’s my question. WTF is this Cambridge 4 thing I saw talked about only once on TV? Because if it’s 4 intelligence guys in Cambridge colluding with Mi6 agent Steele then isn’t it really English interference in our election not Russian? 

 

https://larouchepub.com/pr/2020/20200810_cambridge4.html

Aug. 10, 2020 (EIRNS)—Steven P. Schrage is a former George W. Bush government official and present consultant, who wrote “The Spies Who Hijacked America” on investigative journalist Matt Taibbi’s blog on Aug. 9. Schrage means British spies, whom he calls “the Cambridge Four” and compares to “the Cambridge Five” of Kim Philby, Guy Burgess, Anthony Blunt, Donald Maclean, John Cairncross; and whom he calls the movers both for the firing of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as National Security Adviser and for the entire “Russiagate” coup drive against President Donald Trump. Schrage makes clear he is providing information to the investigative counsel U.S. Attorney John Durham appointed by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the intelligence services in “Russiagate.”

Just intelligence officials working behind the scenes to try and frame the  narrative. They were listening in and sending out invites to draw people to seminars. And sharing information behind the scenes.

I would suggest checking to see if these guys were affiliated with any other dossiers that eminated from the UK. 

Perhaps relevant keywords to search would be September dossier and/or dodgy dossier

Durham probe is effectively over.

He interviewed Brennan last week, and this was a wrap-up interview as Brennan was not considered a suspect or central figure in the probe.

The FBI lawyer was the sacrificial lamb. Dude is gonna get around 3 months.

Nothing Durham found substantially changed the body of the Russia probe. The FBI lawyer meddling was after several previous warrants were granted.

Same conclusion as IG.

It's happening guys! This is it!

VTCO -

Durham probe is effectively over.

He interviewed Brennan last week, and this was a wrap-up interview as Brennan was not considered a suspect or central figure in the probe.

The FBI lawyer was the sacrificial lamb. Dude is gonna get around 3 months.

Nothing Durham found substantially changed the body of the Russia probe. The FBI lawyer meddling was after several previous warrants were granted.

Same conclusion as IG.

Those warrants are about to be invalidated and deemed illegal. 

He fabricated it for the last one bet they are also aware of the information in the first one. 

I believe that's probably what he flipped on. Gave up the goods on why the information was not included in the first FISA and probably who decided to include the dossier as evidence for the FISA. 

I'm not a legal expert  but what happens when they are all considered invalid?

Could this also have been tied in to the plea deal?

https://mobile.twitter.com/CasualSemi/status/1300512903972487169