Evolutionary reason for the nutsack?

Frankly, I'm just not seeing it.

The nutsack contains your balls, and your balls are quite sensitive to pain. If your balls were inside of you, you wouldn't be at risk of extreme pain and injury in that area in the same way you are now.

It seems to me that your balls ought to be inside your body, maybe down in the taint area.

Does this disprove evolution? Discuss.

It's a temperature thing, I think. Phone Post 3.0

Temperature regulation. The scrotums main function. Being inside your body would make thst harder to accomplish.

How else would we tea bag our significant others? you dummy Phone Post 3.0

everything must have a weakness. the balls is ours.

IgnorantDeadline - Temperature regulation. The scrotums main function. Being inside your body would make thst harder to accomplish.


This.



 



That's why your sack shrivels up when it's cold.



 

Sperm dies at 98.6. Temp regulation. Phone Post 3.0

Seems like we should evolve to have sperm that dies at 107 or something.

MMA Playwright - Seems like we should evolve to have sperm that dies at 107 or something.

This.

Soul Gravy - 
MMA Playwright - Seems like we should evolve to have sperm that dies at 107 or something.

This.


Jesus, get off my back - I've only been jizzing in the fireplace for a few years now.  These things take time

How else could we please our females with a little something called a Roman helmet? Come on OG, I expect more from you. Phone Post 3.0

Checkmate, atheists. Phone Post 3.0