Good News: Hillary super pac

Im DEFINITELY with her nomination...break down those dnc cuckedout barriers...STRONGER TOGETHER!

https://www.google.com/amp/www.mediaite.com/online/tone-deaf-hillary-clinton-forms-super-pac-in-order-to-become-part-of-the-resistance/amp/

Tone-Deaf Hillary Clinton Forms Super PAC in Order to Become ‘Part of the Resistance’

COLIN KALMBACHER MAY 8, 2017 11:43 AM

In a wide-ranging interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour last week, Hillary Clintonsignaled her intent to form a Super PAC as part of “the Resistance” mobilizing against President Trump.

That Super PAC, officially known as “Onward Together”, is a terrible idea that no one wants, so of course, it’s the perfect next act in Hillary Clinton’s never-ending tragicomedy of errors.

For one thing, the notion that pouring millions of big-donor dollars into politics is what the country needs is proof-positive that Hillary and her clique still haven’t learned a thing from their resounding defeat.

The long-held progressive critique of Super PACs–that they’re vehicles for corruption and the erosion of American democracy by a loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires–has become a super-majoritarian opinion held by voters across the partisan and ideological divide.

But if there’s a team of well-connected crackpot realists skilled at misreading the mood of the electorate better than Clintonian Democrats, most Americans have yet to encounter them.

Yet still, they persist. So, what does Onward Together even really hope to offer?

Maybe they’ll convince Wisconsin congressional candidates to hire a consultant whose sage advice will be to spend money on advertising in Chicago. (Clinton famously didn’t set foot in Wisconsin during the general election, but spent late money in a state she was always going to win in order to boost her popular vote total. She lost Wisconsin to Trump by less than 23,000 votes.)

That same consultant might offer candidates in Michigan the idea that to win re-election, they should disappear from the spotlight. (According to Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes in Shattered, Clinton’s response to Bernie Sanders besting her in the Michigan primary was to give up on campaigning in the Rust Belt during the general election. She lost Michigan to Trump by less than 11,000 votes.)

All snark aside, the only thing Clinton is offering with Onward Together is more of the same. Expect the familiar cast of overzealous Hillary dead-enders, myopic-but-loyal hangers-on, gross political negligence and the mealy-mouthed language of neoliberalism that begs for derision from both the left and the right.

Tezlyn Figaro, Sanders’ former National Justice Director, summed up the opinion of everyone who isn’t Peter Daou during a recent appearance on Fox News. While debating a former Clinton staffer, she said:

“[Onward Together] is nothing but a money-grab to get donors to donate to a PAC that’s ineffective…They have simply re-gifted an old gift that no one wanted at Christmas and decided to put a new bow on it, thinking people would forget what’s actually in the package.”

Fair or not, Onward Together probably won’t be seen as anything more than another in a long line of Clinton family slush funds. The Clintons are a dynastic clan with real and perceived sleaze all over everything they touch–and nothing’s going to change that.

Any ideas, organizations or politicians associated with the Clinton brand are probably doomed to failure–if not with Democratic Party stalwarts then certainly with the general public. Conservatives, for their part, will probably lick their lips at the continued presence and prominence of Clinton, Inc. on the political scene.

Though promising to act as a “quiet catalyst” for Clinton’s preferred politicians and policies, no one in any possible world could possibly believe the Clintons will be able to skate by undetected. An Onward Together expenditure in a close race or for a ballot measure hinging on turnout would be something akin to a kiss of death. Hillary Clinton is political poison.

The Democratic Party, obsessed with optics to a fault, should disavow Clinton’s latest foray into a political culture that’s twice in a row told her she’s just not wanted.

Whatever staying power the anti-Trump resistance is able to muster, it’s obvious most of the energy is coming from young people and grassroots organizations–not the elite Democratic donor class or Lena Dunhams of the world to which Hillary Clinton owes her entire relevance.

If Hillary Clinton really cares about effectively resisting Trump’s agenda, the best thing she could do would be to just shut up and go back to Chappaqua. But she doesn’t, so she won’t. As always, with Hillary Clinton, it’s all about Her.

"I lost, and I am a sore loser, so I am going to be an asshole to the guy that beat me"

she owns the democratic party

her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 

fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity

BigEyedFish - 


she owns the democratic party



her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 



fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity


I used to think that but now that she's out of the presidential picture are the Clintons at all powerful in the DNC any longer? Maybe they can get their daughter elected in NY or some other blue state, but what does that do for the national party?

White347LX - 
BigEyedFish - 


she owns the democratic party



her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 



fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity


I used to think that but now that she's out of the presidential picture are the Clintons at all powerful in the DNC any longer? Maybe they can get their daughter elected in NY or some other blue state, but what does that do for the national party?

who has stepped up to fill the void? Bernie is the only one with any really national presence.

cruedi - 
White347LX - 
BigEyedFish - 


she owns the democratic party



her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 



fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity


I used to think that but now that she's out of the presidential picture are the Clintons at all powerful in the DNC any longer? Maybe they can get their daughter elected in NY or some other blue state, but what does that do for the national party?

who has stepped up to fill the void? Bernie is the only one with any really national presence.

Obama?

BigEyedFish -


she owns the democratic party



her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 



fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity

But she's a loser

Hillary secretly hates the DNC

Stronghold -
BigEyedFish -


she owns the democratic party



her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 



fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity

But she's a loser
They don't care it's about the delusion of position and status

They stupidly think since she won the popular vote all she has to do is campaign in the battleground states harder and it's a lock

Her main problem is the left's revolt against her not trump

Lady is smokin the drapes 

 

 

 

I wonder who is dumb enough to send money to Clinton at this point. Those people must be dumb as rocks.

"Anyone not willing to accept the results of an election is a threat to democracy!" - Hillary Clinton

White347LX - 
BigEyedFish - 


she owns the democratic party



her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 



fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity


I used to think that but now that she's out of the presidential picture are the Clintons at all powerful in the DNC any longer? Maybe they can get their daughter elected in NY or some other blue state, but what does that do for the national party?

The Clinton's still wield a ton of power inside the federal bureaucracy. They've spent the last 25 years filling non-elected positions with their sycophants and disciples. They also still wield a good bit of influence in Congress, where they spent the last quarter-century as gold-givers to every Democrat currently in the legislative branch. Hillary still has plenty of influence with the old guard leaders like Pelosi and Schumer who her money and contacts helped put in office and elevate to those leadership positions.

Steve4192 -
White347LX - 
BigEyedFish - 


she owns the democratic party



her and the dems and the media will team up to lose yet another election 



fucking blue team - no end to their stupidity


I used to think that but now that she's out of the presidential picture are the Clintons at all powerful in the DNC any longer? Maybe they can get their daughter elected in NY or some other blue state, but what does that do for the national party?

The Clinton's still wield a ton of power inside the federal bureaucracy. They've spent the last 25 years filling non-elected positions with their sycophants and disciples. They also still wield a good bit of influence in Congress, where they spent the last quarter-century as gold-givers to every Democrat currently in the legislative branch. Hillary still has plenty of influence with the old guard leaders like Pelosi and Schumer who her money and contacts helped put in office and elevate to those leadership positions.
Yep and the old guard Clinton crowd are dividing the Democrat Party in perpetuity

It's an interesting situation. She is the definition of damaged goods at this point, but she still has a lot of ammunition, and she seems to be saying she is not giving up. It puts the dems in a tough position. It's hard for them to develop another candidate with Hillary doing all this. Sanders is the only other candidate who has floated a new and different direction for the party, but he's not a woman, so the feminists will feel like they are betraying themselves if they move their support away from Hillary. Chelsea or Michele Obama would be the interesting choices for them, but it would be a pretty wild move if either of them were interested. It would kind of like out-Trump-ing Trump by putting an interesting media figure out there with no formal experience governing.

Go away

Slydawg - Michelle Obama doesn't seem capable. I could see her making an ass Of herself in debates way worse than say Sara Palin.
I agree she ain't got the juice