I think the word love is in ink pen the rest might be legit.
Paul should win without much trouble
This is a step backwards from Woodley.
1 Like
Tommy Fury has been boxing a whole hell of a lot longer than Jake Paul. Not professionally but training wise.
I wouldnāt be so certain on a Jake Paul victory here.
Nah, there would be swelling or fading that just looks fake AF. Iād put money on it.
Tommy isnāt very good. Iāve seen all of his fights and heās nothing like his brother. No ring IQ, no real talent. Heās just an athletic guy with size and reach.
I wouldnāt be surprised if Jake Paul beat him. Not that Jake is any good either.
1 Like
Tommy wil be the first guy Jake has ever fought in his weight division. Tommy can box and Tommy has power. The only way Jake wins, is if itās a workā¦
1 Like
Here we go again lol.
Every Jake Paul fight is a work if he wins.
2 Likes
I donāt have any tattooās,so I donāt know if swelling is normal or not.Tyron did have a tattoo person there with a tattoo gun,so it was a pretty damn good fake.
It looks nothing like a real tattoo, especially a fresh one. You canāt get stabbed with needles and not have some sort of redness or swelling.
98% chance thatās some marker or pen. Having a tattoo artist around with a gun for a photo op isnāt that hard.
And in the (way) off chance that it is real? Tattoos on palms or soles of feet just do not last so it will mostly disappear on its own.
1 Like
[quote=āSteven_McTowelie, post:31, topic:3694089, full:trueā]
Tattoo artists are really good at drawing with a pen also.
Bas Ruttenās palm tat seems to be lastingā¦
1 Like
Iāve seen others as well. Probably done well and deep.
I know many tattoo artists and itās just not something they recommend as they generally donāt last.
But there is Bas. Jesse James I think still has his. Some other random Iāve seen on tv has one thatās hanging on.
Nothing is absolute but if you want something to last itās probably best to do it elsewhere!
Woodley is a clown and that tattoo pic is a major L whether it was a real tattoo or not
Jake is his daddy and owns him for life
1 Like
Tommyās opponents have a combined record of 14-175. The only guy he fought who had a winning record is 3-0 against guys who are 0-25.
Tommy can āboxā, but heās just not a good boxer. He didnāt have the amateur pedigree that Tyson had. He started boxing much later in life.
Honestly him and Jake are about on par with their boxing accolades. Neither have wins over any legitimate boxers. Neither have been tested. Iād put Tommy at only marginally the favourite. And by marginally I mean 60/40.
I get the criticism about Tommyās record, but Jake Paulās opponents have a combined record of ā¦0-0 and his performances in those have been VERY dubious/arguably fixed at times.
Theyre both absolute novices in boxing terms but I agree with you that Tommy should have the edge. Heās bigger, more athletic and is actually where Iād expect a lower tier 7-0 fighter to be in his career. Its not like he is a hot amateur prospect like his brother that is going to move through the pro ranks quickly
Thatās pretty much what the betting odds are. Paul was the favorite against Robinson, Askren and Woodley. This is the first time heās the underdog.
Am i retarded or is Fury blatantly obvious EZ money?