How in the fucking FUCK could a judge not make the first round, at the absolute minimum, 10-8?
Personally I'd have the first round 10-7 and the second 10-8. Maybe some others 10-8 as well.
How in the fucking FUCK could a judge not make the first round, at the absolute minimum, 10-8?
Personally I'd have the first round 10-7 and the second 10-8. Maybe some others 10-8 as well.
Does it matter
Kid Charlemagne -10-7?
Bullshit thread
.
I'll help you guys out since you don't know the Unified Rules of MMA.
"4. A round is to be scored as a 10-7 Round when a contestant totally dominates by striking or grappling in a round."
bruised -Kid Charlemagne - 10-7?
Bullshit thread.
.
10-8's are incredibly rare in this sport and 10-7's are pretty much unheard of. I could see a few of those earlier rounds being a 10-8, but when I think of a 10-7 I think of the first round of Edgar-Maynard 2.
Kid Charlemagne -How many take downs did jds stop? Lol @ this TROLL calling for a 10-7
"Nevermind he spent the whole round running and got his head caved in, he wasn't dominated because he stopped a takedown or two!"
Anyway, if you'll read the OP, this thread is about the judges not even giving it a 10-8, and how I personally would score it 10-7.
Does the first round of this fight meet this description?
2. A round is to be scored as a 10-9 Round when a contestant wins by a close margin, landing the greater number of effective legal strikes, grappling and other maneuvers;
Hate to disagree with you guys, but technically he is right and I agree with Orcus. Although it doesn't matter, because Cain still won the fight in dominating fashion.
MasterofMartialArts - Hate to disagree with you guys, but technically he is right and I agree with Orcus. Although it doesn't matter, because Cain still won the fight in dominating fashion.
Precidence are even more important than a rule which has no strict guidelines. It cannot be a 10-7.
10-7? Are you fucking joking? Is this a 15-round boxing match? If not, then a 10-7 score is irrelevant.
Even 10-8 is a joke is in 3-round MMA.
Because of the small number of rounds, boxing scoring is terrible.
Of course, it's been a decade now and we are still using a shitty scoring system for MMA.
And NO, half-point rounds arent a solution.
50-43 imo.
They didn't give Wineland a 10-8 after 3 knock downs in the 1st.
PR - 10-7? Are you fucking joking? Is this a 15-round boxing match? If not, then a 10-7 score is irrelevant.
Even 10-8 is a joke is in 3-round MMA.
Because of the small number of rounds, boxing scoring is terrible.
Of course, it's been a decade now and we are still using a shitty scoring system for MMA.
And NO, half-point rounds arent a solution.
orcus -
How in the fucking FUCK could a judge not make the first round, at the absolute minimum, 10-8?
Personally I'd have the first round 10-7 and the second 10-8. Maybe some others 10-8 as well.
Did JDS have any offense whatsoever in the first, a round in which he was potshotted, taken down, slammed, dropped, and pounded nearly to a finish on the ground?
lol @ "how many takedowns did he stop"...Does that mean you can't "totally dominate" a guy even if you beat the complete shit out of him, as long as he blocks a couple punches?
I agree with a 10-7 1st round.
PR - 10-7? Are you fucking joking? Is this a 15-round boxing match? If not, then a 10-7 score is irrelevant.
Even 10-8 is a joke is in 3-round MMA.
Because of the small number of rounds, boxing scoring is terrible.
50-45 all day.
bruised -Kid Charlemagne - 10-7?
Bullshit thread.
.
A 10-7 just because he got dropped?
The first half of the round was just a bunch of stuffed takedowns.
Miller vs Lauzon R1 was 10-8 too