More Durham Indictments Coming Today???

NoNeed4aScreenName -

Lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1306682494855544835

Hmmm

VTCO -

LOL Durhan ain't doing shit.

He gave Barr Clinesmith as a fall guy.

Confirmed he isn't investigating Comey, Brennan, Rice, or anyone else with any name value.

^^^^ Reminder.

VTCO -
VTCO -

LOL Durhan ain't doing shit.

He gave Barr Clinesmith as a fall guy.

Confirmed he isn't investigating Comey, Brennan, Rice, or anyone else with any name value.

^^^^ Reminder.

Did you see apparently sessions was investigating Comey 

https://mobile.twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1308020735290626049

SO I was off by a few days...coming soon.

1 Like
NoNeed4aScreenName - 

https://mobile.twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1308020735290626049

“speculates”

Nothing is going to happen. Republicans are pussies.

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked classified information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

czwthemerph -
Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

No, when Barr referred charges on McCabe to a grand jury and it was one of those cases where they did not issue an indictment, despite it being possible to get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Barr had no choice in not prosecuting because he could not get an indictment. Oops!

Also you are misinformed, McCabe had full authority to tell the press what he had an employee tell them. He did not and in fact could not have leaked it illegally, because he was an original authority. Oops again!

Crazy Larry -
czwthemerph -
Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

No, when Barr referred charges on McCabe to a grand jury and it was one of those cases where they did not issue an indictment, despite it being possible to get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Barr had no choice in not prosecuting because he could not get an indictment. Oops!

Also you are misinformed, McCabe had full authority to tell the press what he had an employee tell them. He did not and in fact could not have leaked it illegally, because he was an original authority. Oops again!

If I’m not mistake they kept asking the DOJ if they were going to prosecute. 

Doj then refused

The Department of Justice said Friday that it has dropped its criminal investigation against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and will not press charges against him.

NoNeed4aScreenName - 
Crazy Larry -
czwthemerph -
Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

No, when Barr referred charges on McCabe to a grand jury and it was one of those cases where they did not issue an indictment, despite it being possible to get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Barr had no choice in not prosecuting because he could not get an indictment. Oops!

Also you are misinformed, McCabe had full authority to tell the press what he had an employee tell them. He did not and in fact could not have leaked it illegally, because he was an original authority. Oops again!

If I’m not mistake they kept asking the DOJ if they were going to prosecute. 

Doj then refused

The Department of Justice said Friday that it has dropped its criminal investigation against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and will not press charges against him.

"However, prosecutors opened a criminal investigation and called witnesses before a grand jury in Washington.
 
In mid-September, prosecutors indicated to McCabe’s attorneys that the government planned to seek an indictment against the former senior FBI official in connection with the findings by Justice Department and FBI watchdogs that he misled them.
 
Defense attorneys are typically told of an expected indictment a day or two ahead of time. However, in McCabe’s case, no indictment was announced.
 
Press reports said jurors who sit on the Washington-based grand jury who heard testimony were in the courthouse that week, but there was no indication any indictment was returned. The silence led to speculation that the grand jury might have produced a rare “no bill,” where jurors decline to vote an indictment recommended by prosecutors."
 
 
 
 
They tried to indict him and failed, meaning they were less able to convince a grand jury that McCabe was guilty of a crime than they would be of convincing them that a ham sandwich had.
Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName - 
Crazy Larry -
czwthemerph -
Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

No, when Barr referred charges on McCabe to a grand jury and it was one of those cases where they did not issue an indictment, despite it being possible to get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Barr had no choice in not prosecuting because he could not get an indictment. Oops!

Also you are misinformed, McCabe had full authority to tell the press what he had an employee tell them. He did not and in fact could not have leaked it illegally, because he was an original authority. Oops again!

If I’m not mistake they kept asking the DOJ if they were going to prosecute. 

Doj then refused

The Department of Justice said Friday that it has dropped its criminal investigation against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and will not press charges against him.

"However, prosecutors opened a criminal investigation and called witnesses before a grand jury in Washington.
 
In mid-September, prosecutors indicated to McCabe’s attorneys that the government planned to seek an indictment against the former senior FBI official in connection with the findings by Justice Department and FBI watchdogs that he misled them.
 
Defense attorneys are typically told of an expected indictment a day or two ahead of time. However, in McCabe’s case, no indictment was announced.
 
Press reports said jurors who sit on the Washington-based grand jury who heard testimony were in the courthouse that week, but there was no indication any indictment was returned. The silence led to speculation that the grand jury might have produced a rare “no bill,” where jurors decline to vote an indictment recommended by prosecutors."
 
 
 
 
They tried to indict him and failed, meaning they were less able to convince a grand jury that McCabe was guilty of a crime than they would be of convincing them that a ham sandwich had.

Again you're taking speculation as fact. 

Easily fooled larry should be your new name

NoNeed4aScreenName -
Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName - 
Crazy Larry -
czwthemerph -
Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

No, when Barr referred charges on McCabe to a grand jury and it was one of those cases where they did not issue an indictment, despite it being possible to get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Barr had no choice in not prosecuting because he could not get an indictment. Oops!

Also you are misinformed, McCabe had full authority to tell the press what he had an employee tell them. He did not and in fact could not have leaked it illegally, because he was an original authority. Oops again!

If I’m not mistake they kept asking the DOJ if they were going to prosecute. 

Doj then refused

The Department of Justice said Friday that it has dropped its criminal investigation against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and will not press charges against him.

"However, prosecutors opened a criminal investigation and called witnesses before a grand jury in Washington.
 
In mid-September, prosecutors indicated to McCabe’s attorneys that the government planned to seek an indictment against the former senior FBI official in connection with the findings by Justice Department and FBI watchdogs that he misled them.
 
Defense attorneys are typically told of an expected indictment a day or two ahead of time. However, in McCabe’s case, no indictment was announced.
 
Press reports said jurors who sit on the Washington-based grand jury who heard testimony were in the courthouse that week, but there was no indication any indictment was returned. The silence led to speculation that the grand jury might have produced a rare “no bill,” where jurors decline to vote an indictment recommended by prosecutors."
 
 
 
 
They tried to indict him and failed, meaning they were less able to convince a grand jury that McCabe was guilty of a crime than they would be of convincing them that a ham sandwich had.

Again you're taking speculation as fact. 

Easily fooled larry should be your new name

Facts, not speculation:

Doj prosecutors impaneled a grand jury 

Grand jury had testimony from DoJ witnesses

Doj prosecutors told McCabe to expect an indictment

....No indictment was issued by the grand jury

....DoJ eventually gave up on the pretense of charging McCabe

McCabe had every right to tell the press whatever he wanted about the case as he was an original authority 

Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName -
Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName - 
Crazy Larry -
czwthemerph -
Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

No, when Barr referred charges on McCabe to a grand jury and it was one of those cases where they did not issue an indictment, despite it being possible to get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Barr had no choice in not prosecuting because he could not get an indictment. Oops!

Also you are misinformed, McCabe had full authority to tell the press what he had an employee tell them. He did not and in fact could not have leaked it illegally, because he was an original authority. Oops again!

If I’m not mistake they kept asking the DOJ if they were going to prosecute. 

Doj then refused

The Department of Justice said Friday that it has dropped its criminal investigation against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and will not press charges against him.

"However, prosecutors opened a criminal investigation and called witnesses before a grand jury in Washington.
 
In mid-September, prosecutors indicated to McCabe’s attorneys that the government planned to seek an indictment against the former senior FBI official in connection with the findings by Justice Department and FBI watchdogs that he misled them.
 
Defense attorneys are typically told of an expected indictment a day or two ahead of time. However, in McCabe’s case, no indictment was announced.
 
Press reports said jurors who sit on the Washington-based grand jury who heard testimony were in the courthouse that week, but there was no indication any indictment was returned. The silence led to speculation that the grand jury might have produced a rare “no bill,” where jurors decline to vote an indictment recommended by prosecutors."
 
 
 
 
They tried to indict him and failed, meaning they were less able to convince a grand jury that McCabe was guilty of a crime than they would be of convincing them that a ham sandwich had.

Again you're taking speculation as fact. 

Easily fooled larry should be your new name

Facts, not speculation:

Doj prosecutors impaneled a grand jury 

Grand jury had testimony from DoJ witnesses

Doj prosecutors told McCabe to expect an indictment

....No indictment was issued by the grand jury

....DoJ eventually gave up on the pretense of charging McCabe

McCabe had every right to tell the press whatever he wanted about the case as he was an original authority 

Read your quote. It says right there lead to speculation about a rare no bill.

see that word speculation?

NoNeed4aScreenName -
Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName -
Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName - 
Crazy Larry -
czwthemerph -
Crazy Larry - 

Remember when they couldn't even get an indictment on McCabe, despite trying so very hard, and despite the OG motto that "you can get an indictment on a ham sandwich"?

Lol, good times. 

Oh you mean when AG Barr inexplicably said they wouldn’t prosecute after a referral and it being proven that he illegally leaked information?

So Barr is a good guy now?

No, when Barr referred charges on McCabe to a grand jury and it was one of those cases where they did not issue an indictment, despite it being possible to get an indictment for a ham sandwich. Barr had no choice in not prosecuting because he could not get an indictment. Oops!

Also you are misinformed, McCabe had full authority to tell the press what he had an employee tell them. He did not and in fact could not have leaked it illegally, because he was an original authority. Oops again!

If I’m not mistake they kept asking the DOJ if they were going to prosecute. 

Doj then refused

The Department of Justice said Friday that it has dropped its criminal investigation against former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and will not press charges against him.

"However, prosecutors opened a criminal investigation and called witnesses before a grand jury in Washington.
 
In mid-September, prosecutors indicated to McCabe’s attorneys that the government planned to seek an indictment against the former senior FBI official in connection with the findings by Justice Department and FBI watchdogs that he misled them.
 
Defense attorneys are typically told of an expected indictment a day or two ahead of time. However, in McCabe’s case, no indictment was announced.
 
Press reports said jurors who sit on the Washington-based grand jury who heard testimony were in the courthouse that week, but there was no indication any indictment was returned. The silence led to speculation that the grand jury might have produced a rare “no bill,” where jurors decline to vote an indictment recommended by prosecutors."
 
 
 
 
They tried to indict him and failed, meaning they were less able to convince a grand jury that McCabe was guilty of a crime than they would be of convincing them that a ham sandwich had.

Again you're taking speculation as fact. 

Easily fooled larry should be your new name

Facts, not speculation:

Doj prosecutors impaneled a grand jury 

Grand jury had testimony from DoJ witnesses

Doj prosecutors told McCabe to expect an indictment

....No indictment was issued by the grand jury

....DoJ eventually gave up on the pretense of charging McCabe

McCabe had every right to tell the press whatever he wanted about the case as he was an original authority 

Read your quote. It says right there lead to speculation about a rare no bill.

see that word speculation?

The colon here indicates that what follows is the list of things that are fact and not speculation:

Facts, not speculation:

DoJ prosecutors impaneled a grand jury 

Grand jury had testimony from DoJ witnesses

Doj prosecutors told McCabe to expect an indictment

....No indictment was issued by the grand jury

....DoJ eventually gave up on the pretense of charging McCabe

McCabe had every right to tell the press whatever he wanted about the case as he was an original authority

The silence led to speculation....

But we know you just ignore things in the public record and go on what you believe and not what's real

Crazy Larry. Let's get your thoughts before talking points....

What you make of this?

https://mobile.twitter.com/RadGeekpartduex/status/1308632907234398208

NoNeed4aScreenName -

The silence led to speculation....

But we know you just ignore things in the public record and go on what you believe and not what's real

They impaneled a grand jury to get an indictment, and they didn't get an indictment. Therefore the grand jury did not return an indictment, even though they would happily issue one for a ham sandwich. I'm not sure which part of that is speculation to you. 

Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName -

The silence led to speculation....

But we know you just ignore things in the public record and go on what you believe and not what's real

They impaneled a grand jury to get an indictment, and they didn't get an indictment. Therefore the grand jury did not return an indictment, even though they would happily issue one for a ham sandwich. I'm not sure which part of that is speculation to you. 

Haha so now the ham sandwich is gonna be your defense for what's coming?

NoNeed4aScreenName -
Crazy Larry -
NoNeed4aScreenName -

The silence led to speculation....

But we know you just ignore things in the public record and go on what you believe and not what's real

They impaneled a grand jury to get an indictment, and they didn't get an indictment. Therefore the grand jury did not return an indictment, even though they would happily issue one for a ham sandwich. I'm not sure which part of that is speculation to you. 

Haha so now the ham sandwich is gonna be your defense for what's coming?

Guess that means the hacking indictment is shit too then right?