NE journal of medicine - no more genders

On birth certificates

1 Like

https://mobile.twitter.com/NEJM/status/1339616345353154560

1 Like

Lefties are the dumbest people and most anti science folks on earth.

and they want you to take a rushed vaccine.

Uh ok.

12 Likes

Weird thing for the NEJM to care about

2 Likes
Piratenbum - 

https://mobile.twitter.com/NEJM/status/1339616345353154560

Harmful for intersex people? What % of people are born intersex? Why are we changing things just for them? It’s so fucking bizarre abd I can’t help but think the time these idiots spend thinking about abolishing gender could be spent best elsewhere

*face palm*

1 Like

Left people things. Whackjobs the lot. 

2 Likes

‚ÄúWeird thing for the NEJM to care about‚ÄĚ

Leading journals have been infiltrated by the woke movement for awhile now.

1 Like

A penis and testicles are NOT necessarily male sex organs, so this makes sense.  In fact, it is completely illogical to define a baby as male simply because it has a penis when a penis itself may not actually be a penis but in many cases is an external front hole. Both men and women can have a penis or an external front hole, both of which are either male or female sex organs. Similarly, if a person has ovaries and a uterus and is pregnant with a child, science tells us that there is no way to determine the sex of this person. On a cellular level, the male uterus and ovaries are identical to the female uterus and ovaries. In many cases a male may simply have an internal scrotum, as may a female.  If an external front hole is surgically removed, a female may become a male despite him now having an internal front hole rather than an internal scrotum. It's all in the medical literature.

Its simply outdated science to label a baby as either male or female, no different from believing that Zeus is the cause of lightning.

3 Likes
turducken -

A penis and testicles are NOT necessarily male sex organs, so this makes sense.  In fact, it is completely illogical to define a baby as male simply because it has a penis when a penis itself may not actually be a penis but in many cases is an external front hole. Both men and women can have a penis or an external front hole, both of which are either male or female sex organs. Similarly, if a person has ovaries and a uterus and is pregnant with a child, science tells us that there is no way to determine the sex of this person. On a cellular level, the male uterus and ovaries are identical to the female uterus and ovaries. In many cases a male may simply have an internal scrotum, as may a female.  If an external front hole is surgically removed, a female may become a male despite him now having an internal front hole rather than an internal scrotum. It's all in the medical literature.

Its simply outdated science to label a baby as either male or female, no different from believing that Zeus is the cause of lightning.

If you have a dick, then your a boy. If you have a vagina, then your a girl. 

See how simple that was. 

No need to apply your illogical nonsense as to how a baby is seen as a male or female. 

It's actually one of the simplest things on the planet to understand. 

4 Likes

Not to mention must places that require you to provide them with a copy of your birth certificate require that your gender be clearly stated on your birth certificate. 

Try getting any type of security clearance without one. 

1 Like
baj54 -
turducken -

A penis and testicles are NOT necessarily male sex organs, so this makes sense.  In fact, it is completely illogical to define a baby as male simply because it has a penis when a penis itself may not actually be a penis but in many cases is an external front hole. Both men and women can have a penis or an external front hole, both of which are either male or female sex organs. Similarly, if a person has ovaries and a uterus and is pregnant with a child, science tells us that there is no way to determine the sex of this person. On a cellular level, the male uterus and ovaries are identical to the female uterus and ovaries. In many cases a male may simply have an internal scrotum, as may a female.  If an external front hole is surgically removed, a female may become a male despite him now having an internal front hole rather than an internal scrotum. It's all in the medical literature.

Its simply outdated science to label a baby as either male or female, no different from believing that Zeus is the cause of lightning.

If you have a dick, then your a boy. If you have a vagina, then your a girl. 

See how simple that was. 

No need to apply your illogical nonsense as to how a baby is seen as a male or female. 

It's actually one of the simplest things on the planet to understand. 

What you posted is literally the textbook definition of white supremacy.  Unbelievable to see such blatant racism out in the open...only in a Trump presidency!

3 Likes
turducken -

A penis and testicles are NOT necessarily male sex organs, so this makes sense.  In fact, it is completely illogical to define a baby as male simply because it has a penis when a penis itself may not actually be a penis but in many cases is an external front hole. Both men and women can have a penis or an external front hole, both of which are either male or female sex organs. Similarly, if a person has ovaries and a uterus and is pregnant with a child, science tells us that there is no way to determine the sex of this person. On a cellular level, the male uterus and ovaries are identical to the female uterus and ovaries. In many cases a male may simply have an internal scrotum, as may a female.  If an external front hole is surgically removed, a female may become a male despite him now having an internal front hole rather than an internal scrotum. It's all in the medical literature.

Its simply outdated science to label a baby as either male or female, no different from believing that Zeus is the cause of lightning.

The level of thought you put into this troll makes me wonder...

This shit is completely disgusting. They are pandering to less than .001% of the population. And, we’re all just supposed to put our heads in the sand. Fucking clown shoes.

3 Likes

It says a lot that they’re concerned about the harm being done to the .03% of intersexed but not the 99.97% of normal kids...

2 Likes

Wokeness is a mental illness. 

2 Likes

Liberals are anti science? 

![](upload://iONQ4G9CPtHTtCFe5hYVQldkwFo.gif)

turducken -

A penis and testicles are NOT necessarily male sex organs, so this makes sense.  In fact, it is completely illogical to define a baby as male simply because it has a penis when a penis itself may not actually be a penis but in many cases is an external front hole. Both men and women can have a penis or an external front hole, both of which are either male or female sex organs. Similarly, if a person has ovaries and a uterus and is pregnant with a child, science tells us that there is no way to determine the sex of this person. On a cellular level, the male uterus and ovaries are identical to the female uterus and ovaries. In many cases a male may simply have an internal scrotum, as may a female.  If an external front hole is surgically removed, a female may become a male despite him now having an internal front hole rather than an internal scrotum. It's all in the medical literature.

Its simply outdated science to label a baby as either male or female, no different from believing that Zeus is the cause of lightning.

Blow it out of your external front hole , turdickless

turducken -

A penis and testicles are NOT necessarily male sex organs, so this makes sense.  In fact, it is completely illogical to define a baby as male simply because it has a penis when a penis itself may not actually be a penis but in many cases is an external front hole. Both men and women can have a penis or an external front hole, both of which are either male or female sex organs. Similarly, if a person has ovaries and a uterus and is pregnant with a child, science tells us that there is no way to determine the sex of this person. On a cellular level, the male uterus and ovaries are identical to the female uterus and ovaries. In many cases a male may simply have an internal scrotum, as may a female.  If an external front hole is surgically removed, a female may become a male despite him now having an internal front hole rather than an internal scrotum. It's all in the medical literature.

Its simply outdated science to label a baby as either male or female, no different from believing that Zeus is the cause of lightning.