Ray Elbe -Or Japan?frederic -In America or Brazil?!Bozy_LUBMMA.com - How would they stop it from happening Kirik? Serious question.They can't stop him, but they can sue him after the fact.
MMAHAWK -Nope, anywhere. Ufc won't release him to some crooked promoter in Japandanggook -Galanis -Do you understand what lifetime ban means? Means he is banned from fighting.Kirik -
Wand remains under contract with the UFC.
How can that be possible, though? He is not allowed to fight ever again, period.
So basically, this whole ordeal has banned him from making a living, EVER, in his chosen profession?
For the remainder of his life.
In Nevada not the rest of the world.
FatFrenchFry -If he wants to leave all the comforts the USA affords himRay Elbe -Or Japan?frederic -In America or Brazil?!Bozy_LUBMMA.com - How would they stop it from happening Kirik? Serious question.They can't stop him, but they can sue him after the fact.
If he opened gyms there, he could keep fighting.
And with his name/fame over there, I can't see how they wouldn't succeed.
Wand is crazy and pissed off enough that I could see it happening. Unless the UFC threatens him with a lawsuit like the NSAC did, which wouldn't go over well with the public and media 
NSAC rulings have no jurisdiction in Japan.
As the UFC abides by athletic commission rulings regardless of where they hold shows, Wand's "lifetime ban" makes it impossible for UFC to ever book him.
It would be hard for UFC to make a credible case for why they would keep a guy under contract as a fighter when they cannot ever use him as a fighter.
It's not like he has a downside guarantee or is receiving a monthly stipend from the UFC or they transitioned him to a salaried ambassador role (and why would they, given how his career ended?)
Even a Nevada kangaroo court would realize keeping a fighter under contract when they can NEVER book him a fight is ridiculous.
VTCO - NSAC rulings have no jurisdiction in Japan.In the real world there is no get out of jail free card in his contract.
As the UFC abides by athletic commission rulings regardless of where they hold shows, Wand's "lifetime ban" makes it impossible for UFC to ever book him.
It would be hard for UFC to make a credible case for why they would keep a guy under contract as a fighter when they cannot ever use him as a fighter.
It's not like he has a downside guarantee or is receiving a monthly stipend from the UFC or they transitioned him to a salaried ambassador role (and why would they, given how his career ended?)
Even a Nevada kangaroo court would realize keeping a fighter under contract when they can NEVER book him a fight is ridiculous.
Galanis -You are now. Welcome to the resistance.
If so.. fuck the UFC and fuck the NSAC. I am not an anti UFC poster. But if they're literally going to dangle Wand's contract above him and say "you cannot make a living to feed your family in your profession" due to the NSAC ruling. That is completely fucked.
They should at least let him go if he will never be allowed to fight again here. It's a lot more fucked up to prevent a man from making a living.
RyannVonDoom -Funny how the sympathy is with the cheater. Wanderlei can go get a job at home depot or something. That won't put him in breach of contract. They will need a preemployment urine sample however.Galanis -You are now. Welcome to the resistance.
If so.. fuck the UFC and fuck the NSAC. I am not an anti UFC poster. But if they're literally going to dangle Wand's contract above him and say "you cannot make a living to feed your family in your profession" due to the NSAC ruling. That is completely fucked.
They should at least let him go if he will never be allowed to fight again here. It's a lot more fucked up to prevent a man from making a living.
lol at welcome to the Resistance. Good job RVD
danggook -From the U.S. guy. He could still fight overseas. One athletic commission in one country doesn't speak for the world.Galanis -Do you understand what lifetime ban means? Means he is banned from fighting.Kirik -
Wand remains under contract with the UFC.
How can that be possible, though? He is not allowed to fight ever again, period.
So basically, this whole ordeal has banned him from making a living, EVER, in his chosen profession?
For the remainder of his life.
Didn't Baroni just fight at lightweight? And lose?
danggook -RyannVonDoom -Funny how the sympathy is with the cheater. Wanderlei can go get a job at home depot or something. That won't put him in breach of contract. They will need a preemployment urine sample however.Galanis -You are now. Welcome to the resistance.
If so.. fuck the UFC and fuck the NSAC. I am not an anti UFC poster. But if they're literally going to dangle Wand's contract above him and say "you cannot make a living to feed your family in your profession" due to the NSAC ruling. That is completely fucked.
They should at least let him go if he will never be allowed to fight again here. It's a lot more fucked up to prevent a man from making a living.
I promise you, if that fight is going to be on PPV and offered here in the US, the UFC won't let it happen!
NM got my answer. But I doubt "Under contract" to the UFC would really stop a ONE FC from signing a guy and having him fight in some obscure place.
Devin Ratray's gf, WOOF -OK Einstein, let me spell it out for you.danggook -From the U.S. guy. He could still fight overseas. One athletic commission in one country doesn't speak for the world.Galanis -Do you understand what lifetime ban means? Means he is banned from fighting.Kirik -
Wand remains under contract with the UFC.
How can that be possible, though? He is not allowed to fight ever again, period.
So basically, this whole ordeal has banned him from making a living, EVER, in his chosen profession?
For the remainder of his life.
Galanis -No different than any other high profile job. You fuck up, good luck.Kirik -
Wand remains under contract with the UFC.
How can that be possible, though? He is not allowed to fight ever again, period.
So basically, this whole ordeal has banned him from making a living, EVER, in his chosen profession?
danggook -VTCO - NSAC rulings have no jurisdiction in Japan.In the real world there is no get out of jail free card in his contract.
As the UFC abides by athletic commission rulings regardless of where they hold shows, Wand's "lifetime ban" makes it impossible for UFC to ever book him.
It would be hard for UFC to make a credible case for why they would keep a guy under contract as a fighter when they cannot ever use him as a fighter.
It's not like he has a downside guarantee or is receiving a monthly stipend from the UFC or they transitioned him to a salaried ambassador role (and why would they, given how his career ended?)
Even a Nevada kangaroo court would realize keeping a fighter under contract when they can NEVER book him a fight is ridiculous.
VTCO -You're a fucking morondanggook -VTCO - NSAC rulings have no jurisdiction in Japan.In the real world there is no get out of jail free card in his contract.
As the UFC abides by athletic commission rulings regardless of where they hold shows, Wand's "lifetime ban" makes it impossible for UFC to ever book him.
It would be hard for UFC to make a credible case for why they would keep a guy under contract as a fighter when they cannot ever use him as a fighter.
It's not like he has a downside guarantee or is receiving a monthly stipend from the UFC or they transitioned him to a salaried ambassador role (and why would they, given how his career ended?)
Even a Nevada kangaroo court would realize keeping a fighter under contract when they can NEVER book him a fight is ridiculous.
In the real world, Wand isn't under UFC contract in perpetuity. The day will come when he is a free agent.
In the real world, a NSAC ruling and their "lifetime ban" has zero bearing overseas, and a Japanese promoter would laugh at the notion of abiding by such a ban.
When you get out of your fantasy world where Nevada's ban means Wand can't fight "For the remainder of his life", come back to the real world and rejoin the conversation, kid.
Would watch....
All one minute or less of the fight....
danggook -VTCO -You're a fucking morondanggook -VTCO - NSAC rulings have no jurisdiction in Japan.In the real world there is no get out of jail free card in his contract.
As the UFC abides by athletic commission rulings regardless of where they hold shows, Wand's "lifetime ban" makes it impossible for UFC to ever book him.
It would be hard for UFC to make a credible case for why they would keep a guy under contract as a fighter when they cannot ever use him as a fighter.
It's not like he has a downside guarantee or is receiving a monthly stipend from the UFC or they transitioned him to a salaried ambassador role (and why would they, given how his career ended?)
Even a Nevada kangaroo court would realize keeping a fighter under contract when they can NEVER book him a fight is ridiculous.
In the real world, Wand isn't under UFC contract in perpetuity. The day will come when he is a free agent.
In the real world, a NSAC ruling and their "lifetime ban" has zero bearing overseas, and a Japanese promoter would laugh at the notion of abiding by such a ban.
When you get out of your fantasy world where Nevada's ban means Wand can't fight "For the remainder of his life", come back to the real world and rejoin the conversation, kid.