Real Collusion: Google Gave Hillary 2.6M Votes!

The number could be as high as 10M

Russian collusion wasn't real but this certainly is.

Google Expert to Senator Cruz: 15 Million 2020 Votes At Risk

Big Tech's biggest threat to democracy isn't censorship or privacy: it's election manipulation.

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, "Google and Censorship through Search Engines," Dr. Robert Epstein, who researches the impact of Google, informed the hearing that "upwards of 15 million votes" were in jeopardy in the 2020 election. During his testimony, Epstein told Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) that in 2016, Google gave at least 2.6 million votes to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, "through bias and search results." He stressed that was the lowest number.

When questioned further by Cruz, Epstein gave a more concise answer: "The range is between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes depending on how aggressive they were in using the techniques that I've been studying, such as the search engine manipulation effect, the search suggestion effect, the answer bot effect, and a number of others. They control these and no one can counteract them. These are not competitive. These are tools that they have at their disposal exclusively."

 

https://twitter.com/hashtag/FakeNews?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

22 Likes

Not surprised,  google will double down this election like the execs said they would

1 Like

Context, because I know the OG needs it:

 

By the way, it is not just conservative content that gets censored (Epstein, 2018h). At times, Google also censors progressive and socialist content. The problem with Google is not that it censors conservatives; the problem is that it has the power to determine what content billions of people worldwide will or not see. No single entity – especially a private company that is not accountable to the public – should have such power (Epstein, 2016d).

2 Likes

In for spin!

Junnk -

In for spin!

Crimecorn's OP is the actual spin. 

 

Epstien is a butthurt Google hater who has been after them since 2012 because they rightfully put a warning on search results for his site that said it had walware. 

 

He later  admitted the site was infected, but tried to blame Google for not fixing it. Lmfao.

 

But of course this one biased "reasearcher" is correct about google swaying voters towards Hillary, and all the other rrsearch that shows Google results pushed people towards pro-Trump sites (even fake russian sites) are #fakenews according to the hypothetical OP. 

 

Good times. 

2 Likes

Lol

the google "expert" has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/

1 Like

Maybe he has GDS?

1 Like

 

8 Likes
Pratty - 

Lol

the google "expert" has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.

2 Likes

Hill-dawg with the KO

2 Likes

REEEE! Election was rigged for Hillary! Even tho trump won? Lmao. 

 

1 Like
Pedro Navaja -


 



You mean President Hillary?

1 Like
RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 

Lol

the google "expert" has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.


lol. Are you for real?

1 Like
Pratty - 
RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 

Lol

the google "expert" has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.


lol. Are you for real?




Ask anybody.

RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 
RenatoCocopreta -
Pratty - 

Lol

the google "expert" has had a beef with google for years

https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/one-mans-fight-with-google-over-a-security-warning/


On a serious note, are you familiar with the penalty for treason, and do you really think the liberal media & tech attempted coup will go unpunished?

Even online supporters and agitators will be held accountable for their crimes. Every last single one.


lol. Are you for real?




Ask anybody.

And Kirik is wondering why the OG is dying


....pussies acting tough making threats

2 Likes

The only thing this tells me is that Hillary Derangement Syndrome is alive and well in Trumpland.

Get over it, Trump won - not the popular vote, of course, but the one that counts, move on with your lives. I'd say it's getting creepy but Trump and his minions passed that threshold about 2 1/2 years ago.

Scary thing is the full-blown meltdown, at minimum, Trump and his cultists will have when he loses '20. Naturally, it'll be all Hillary's fault.

2 Likes
Pedro Navaja -


 



Holy fuck is that a real tweet by the Hill dog? 

1 Like
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA - 
Pedro Navaja -


 



Holy fuck is that a real tweet by the Hill dog? 




She definitely pulled out her bottle of hot sauce for that one.

To the average reader it appears that Google made a mistake and switched voter results. However, it actually looks like Google simply supplied information and search results that were beneficial to Clinton. Is this the gist?

The Leg Collector -
FETT_Lay'n'PrayNINJA -
Junnk -

In for spin!

Crimecorn's OP is the actual spin. 

 

Epstien is a butthurt Google hater who has been after them since 2012 because they rightfully put a warning on search results for his site that said it had walware. 

 

He later  admitted the site was infected, but tried to blame Google for not fixing it. Lmfao.

 

But of course this one biased "reasearcher" is correct about google swaying voters towards Hillary, and all the other rrsearch that shows Google results pushed people towards pro-Trump sites (even fake russian sites) are #fakenews according to the hypothetical OP. 

 

Good times. 


Except that an actual google insider went public and confirmed all this prior to this news. 


 




I didn't finish the full 20 minutes but didn't see anything in the 1st half that "confirmed" that google actually gave votes to Hillary. 


 


I did however, listen to the OG for 2 years saying that social media and the internet cannot influence voters when they were defending the accusations that Russian websites and bots were influencing the election. 


 


But hey, if this one Epstien dude makes a claim based off a 21 person study, it must be fact now!

6 Likes