Yamashita can still take it to people in training supposedly, so yeah, he may also the "the one".
None of the others are though. Inoue loses to Suzuki at times, and Suzuki was upset last weekend in the All-Japan.
(Saito was #2 in the world, which makes him Liborio or something.)
the point is just that the LEGEND of Rickson is that at 46 (sorry, not 48 crazy talk there), he can whoop Filho like no one ever has. That a few years ago when Saulo was in the middle of his 6 Mundials in a row (unequaled by others) that Rickson whipped him (so an early 40s Rickson there).
That kind of legend has only been equaled by Kimura in judo circles (and possibly Yamashita). Kimura trained a Canadian who got 2nd in the 64 Olympics and the guy said (in a documentary) that Kimura judo is just insane (ie. better than someone in their prime who got 2nd in the Olympics)...(paraphrasing, I only saw part of the doc.). Around that time, supposedly Kimura could still defeat Japan's Olympic judo team (ie. as an older man...maybe mid 40s?...damn the parallel))...
I DO find that hard to believe though. I mean, I doubt that Rickson could beat Saulo in the Mundials. Saulo could throw for 2 points and do a Takada-Royce tuck until the bell if he wants...
but in pure rolling/throwing (no points, no time limits), could Rickson/Kimura be that good? (worth noting that supposedly Kimura was the best at both, surpassing the Rickson legend in that regard) Could their skill beat the top competitors in their sports?
Karelin, when he is 46, will not be better than the current #1 (in the future, so future #1) at greco-roman...neither will Jordan, Gretzky, etc.
Kimura was special though apparently. The thing is, none of us saw it, and it wasn't in competition, just practice...
so it could all just be a hoax, this also parallels the Rickson phemonemon (sp?). Either they are both super special talents that come by once a generation, or we have been dupped.