Pura Vida - Its made up data. Every year the uniform crime stats have between 1500 and 2000 gun murders, where the weapon type is "firearms, type not stated." These stats like to pretend none of those were assault weapons.
Lol unless you provide a link to a reliable source, your data is also made up.
Providing a link in no plausible way changes whether my data is made up or not. If you think so, then you have a very serious issue with vocabulary, since that would mean you misunderstand the meaning of nearly every word you just typed. That said, I'm guessing you were just lying when you wrote your post, and do know that what you typed is a demonstrable lie. But, here are the stats anyway.
LOL@the anti-gun folks and the words "consider", "think", or "ponder" in the same sentence. Any group of people who thinks an inanimate object has a mind of its own and that a law is all you need because criminals obey them isn't capable of considering, thinking or pondering anything more complex than a Mad Lib.
LOL@the anti-gun folks and the words "consider", "think", or "ponder" in the same sentence. Any group of people who thinks an inanimate object has a mind of its own and that a law is all you need because criminals obey them isn't capable of considering, thinking or pondering anything more complex than a Mad Lib.
I agree to an extent. And yet many gun enthusiasts and politicians that campaign on 2nd Amendment rights still think that pot should be illegal. I've always found that bizarre.
LOL@the anti-gun folks and the words "consider", "think", or "ponder" in the same sentence. Any group of people who thinks an inanimate object has a mind of its own and that a law is all you need because criminals obey them isn't capable of considering, thinking or pondering anything more complex than a Mad Lib.
I've never met a single anti-gun person who thought or believed any of what you wrote, let alone a group of them. Your inability to make an honest argument for your positions, actually suggest you agree with the anti-gun folks. Otherwise, why would you makeup such an obviously dishonest straw man? If the truth is on your side, there's no reason you needed to be dishonest.
But, you did just argue against having any laws, so that redeems some of your dishonesty.
Pura Vida - Its made up data. Every year the uniform crime stats have between 1500 and 2000 gun murders, where the weapon type is "firearms, type not stated." These stats like to pretend none of those were assault weapons.
Lol unless you provide a link to a reliable source, your data is also made up.
Providing a link in no plausible way changes whether my data is made up or not. If you think so, then you have a very serious issue with vocabulary, since that would mean you misunderstand the meaning of nearly every word you just typed. That said, I'm guessing you were just lying when you wrote your post, and do know that what you typed is a demonstrable lie. But, here are the stats anyway.
Wow, I guess you answered my question whether you are retarded or not.
You said op used made up stats then posted stats of your own without any source. I'm not saying Ops stats are legit, I'm just saying you're a idiot.
no dog in this fight, but pura vida said the stats OP presented were "made up", which means that they are incorrect or fudged in some way, not that there was not a source provided. When you mentioned his lack of a reliable source, he provided one. I am not sure how you come to the conclusion that he is retarded from this exchange. I think maybe you are conflating "made up" with "unsourced".
LOL@the anti-gun folks and the words "consider", "think", or "ponder" in the same sentence. Any group of people who thinks an inanimate object has a mind of its own and that a law is all you need because criminals obey them isn't capable of considering, thinking or pondering anything more complex than a Mad Lib.
<br />
I've never met a single anti-gun person who thought or believed any of what you wrote, let alone a group of them. Your inability to make an honest argument for your positions, actually suggest you agree with the anti-gun folks. Otherwise, why would you makeup such an obviously dishonest straw man? If the truth is on your side, there's no reason you needed to be dishonest.<br />
<br />
But, you did just argue against having any laws, so that redeems some of your dishonesty.</blockquote>
You just outed yourself as a liar. It's been said here multiple times, you can read it all over the internet and hear it in everyday life. Seriously? Lying on the internet? lol....as pathetic as it gets. Gotta maintain that e-rep!
As mentioned above by other posters - you just aren't that smart, possibly retarded.
