I couldn't find the quote, I thought it was in my "Jon Jones vs current top 10UFC Hw" thread but couldn't find it.
But someone on a hypothetical breakdown of Jones vs each top 10, gave a breakdown of how they though these hypothetical fights would go, however when it came to Travis Browne, he said, "Bones and Browne would never fight, they are training partners", and they didn't break down that fight.
Matt Hughes is a true fighter. You either are a true fighter, or you aren't a true fighter. It isn't something that can be taught, you are just born that way.
If Matt was in his prime today, that would mean that he would be training up to todays standards. So, just like he dominated in his day, with the training standards of that day. He would do the same today.
I could see a prime matt hughes losing to everyone of those guys in the top 10 ...
along with mike pierce, jon fitch, thiago alves, kazuo misaki, jay heiron, tyrone woodley, tarec saffedine, nate marquart, ben askren, bj penn ... and others I cant think of on the top of my head.
Seriously, when was matt hughes in his prime and who was he beating?
LOL. What a unintelligent post. If Matt Hughes was in his prime today, he would be number 2 in the division, at the VERY least, if not the dominating champ.
The Roy Nelson thread about Roy claiming he won't get a title shot because Dana doesn't like him, and Dana saying that has nothing to do with it at all, is full of people defending Dana by pointing out that Roy won't get shit because Dana doesn't like him.
MasterofMartialArts - LOL. What a unintelligent post. If Matt Hughes was in his prime today, he would be number 2 in the division, at the VERY least, if not the dominating champ.
MasterofMartialArts - LOL. What a unintelligent post. If Matt Hughes was in his prime today, he would be number 2 in the division, at the VERY least, if not the dominating champ.
MasterofMartialArts - LOL. What a unintelligent post. If Matt Hughes was in his prime today, he would be number 2 in the division, at the VERY least, if not the dominating champ.
LOL @ Dominating champ. Dominating who? Not GSP.
I guess you missed the part where I said number 2 at the very least....and you do realize he did sub GSP in their first fight right? I'm not saying he would always dominate GSP (GSP won 2x), but its not like he never did or couldn't have beat GSP in his prime. Hell, when GSP beat him you could argue he was at the tail end of his career.
Neil McCauley - I could see a prime matt hughes losing to everyone of those guys in the top 10 ...
along with mike pierce, jon fitch, thiago alves, kazuo misaki, jay heiron, tyrone woodley, tarec saffedine, nate marquart, ben askren, bj penn ... and others I cant think of on the top of my head.
Seriously, when was matt hughes in his prime and who was he beating?
MasterofMartialArts - LOL. What a unintelligent post. If Matt Hughes was in his prime today, he would be number 2 in the division, at the VERY least, if not the dominating champ.
LOL @ Dominating champ. Dominating who? Not GSP.
I guess you missed the part where I said number 2 at the very least....and you do realize he did sub GSP in their first fight right? I'm not saying he would always dominate GSP (GSP won 2x), but its not like he never did or couldn't have beat GSP in his prime. Hell, when GSP beat him you could argue he was at the tail end of his career.
It's funny how many guys careers do 180's after fighting gsp.