The Atheist Community is a Hypcritical Joke and a Con

10 years ago, Atheists and the Atheist community universally shared these beliefs and was generally accepted as the main “doctrine” of Atheism and its belief or lack of belief structure.

" You should only believe in things that you can scientifically prove"

Fair enough. Now fast forward to 2020 and now the whole community is now complete phaggots believing in things that can’t be scientifically proven like transgenderism. So far look at what these phaggots have done:

  • Disavowed Richard Dawkins for not accepting the trans movement (good for him for sticking to his guns and seeing the hypocrisy of believing that gender is a spectrum

  • Ex communicated atheist youtube Ratinality Rules…LOL I thought atheism wasn’t a religion

  • Phaggots like Matt Dela Hunty (the atheist experience) promoting this Bullshit ideology that can never be proven scientifically.

This whole movement is a sham and is a “loose” religion at this point. It’s no different from Islam, a major religion without a caliphate. It’s funny now that certain atheists can no longer participate in the movement if they don’t share the same unscientific belief.

2 Likes

Sounds kind of like a…

Religion.

1 Like

It was always a joke, due to the big balls most of their crowd had always slamming Christians and Christianity and dick tucking to all things Muslim and Islam.

3 Likes

Atheists are intellectual virgins.

1 Like

homer simpson episode 13 GIF

Yeah, that Matt hunty guy is a douche.

Also, atheism isn’t about science. It’s about disbelief in theism. There might be individual atheists who believe in the unscientific idea of gender-bending, but that’s because they are radicalized leftists/marxists.

1 Like

Its unfair to lump all athiests together as if atheists are a singular monolithic entity unless you are deliberatly playing identity politics.

2 Likes

Wait, wait…

You’re trying to classify individual disbelievers as a unit? Sorry, doesn’t compute.

1 Like

100% this.

The whole thing is individualistic. There is no playbook.

I’m not even an atheist and I know that.

1 Like

Hitchens, Harris and Dawkins who did more than anyone to popularise atheism in social literature were all, and still are for the two alive, vehemently and publicly anti-Islam

What’s actually happened is the modern liberal movement - attached itself to atheism - because it was on the other side of their number one enemy - western conservatism.

They then purged it of people that were not aligned with their other views (pro Islam, trans rights) - same thing that happened to second wave feminism

2 Likes

That’s 2 step thinking. OP is a surface thinker. Group everyone that I don’t agree with together, give them a straw man belief and then destroy it. Mental solitaire gymnastics.

1 Like