The Jack Brown interview: KEITH KIZER

                    <div class="Article" style="float: left;">
                        <table>
                        <tr style="vertical-align: bottom;">
                        <td>
                            <h3><a href="/go=news.detail&gid=439259" target="_blank">
                                The Jack Brown interview: KEITH KIZER

                            </a></h3>
                        </td>
                        </tr>
                        </table>
                        <a href="/go=news.detail&gid=439259" ><img class="photo" src="http://img.mixedmartialarts.com/method=get&rs=106&q=75&x=7&y=36&w=310&h=165&ro=0&s=keith-kizer-10-13-2013-14-29-4-940.jpg" /></a>



                        <div style="clear: both; line-height: 1px;height: 1px;">&nbsp;</div>
                    </div>


                    <div style="clear: left; line-height: 1px;height: 1px;">&nbsp;</div>

F.R.A.T.

ORIGINAL01ER - F.R.A.T.

I agree but let me take a guess, he doesn't apologize for shit. Phone Post

Sounded like a politician to me. Phone Post

Johnnydeep - I really did try to read that..... Phone Post 3.0


KK on Cannabis



 



"The primary reason was that even though there is no magic number for getting to where we want to go with the detection level, by making it more akin to the other drugs of abuse that are tested only in-competition, the 150 seemed to play into that.  With the idea that no number is perfect, 150 is one that if you stop a week out or so, the odds of you being 150 at competition time are almost nil.  The concern, of course, is that people are going to think, “They tripled the number.  I can smoke the day of the weigh-in.  I used to stop ten days before.  Now I’ll stop ten hours before.”  Unfortunately, it would be counterproductive in that situation.  I hope that athletes don’t use it as a justification not to do the right thing.  I think the bottom line is if you are below 150, the concern of it either giving you any benefit or, more importantly, it putting you at a detriment, is pretty much zero." 

Asked no tough questions. Phone Post 3.0

 

Sir Psycho Sexy - Asked no tough questions. Phone Post 3.0


I just wanted to understand him - just as I have wanted to understand everyone else.   

Jack Brown -
Sir Psycho Sexy - Asked no tough questions. Phone Post 3.0

I just wanted to understand him - just as I have wanted to understand everyone else.   

Ttt but please ask tough questions. Phone Post

End well this will not Phone Post

In. Phone Post

Funny how when someone becomes embattled an interview follows shortly, otherwise they are too cocky to bother answering to the fans.

ABE FROMAN -

Funny how when someone becomes embattled an interview follows shortly, otherwise they are too cocky to bother answering to the fans.

We agreed to the interview before mayweather-alvarez for what it's worth. I don't think there is a time that Kizer hasn't been embattled. Phone Post

Waiting for Keith to post here. Phone Post

That was an enormously informative interview, and I am honored to have it posted on the UG.

For reasons I cannot explain, interviews are often looked and judged by the degree to which they are combative. Implicit in that point of view is that the subject of the interview is an adversary.

Keith Kizer is the most influential regulator in North America. That interview was a terrific window into his decision making.

For example, the story of how levels were set historically and going forward for acceptable levels of marijauna metabolites I don't believe had ever been told before, was very insighful.

Next interview I will demand that Jack ask the subject - right off the bat - "why do you hate America?" ;-)

Kirik -

That was an enormously informative interview, and I am honored to have it posted on the UG.

For reasons I cannot explain, interviews are often looked and judged by the degree to which they are combative. Implicit in that point of view is that the subject of the interview is an adversary.

Keith Kizer is the most influential regulator in North America. That interview was a terrific window into his decision making.

For example, the story of how levels were set historically and going forward for acceptable levels of marijauna metabolites I don't believe had ever been told before, was very insighful.

Next interview I will demand that Jack ask the subject - right off the bat - "why do you hate America?" ;-)

Thanks, Kirik. Even if it was just you and a few others that enjoyed it, that would be cool with me. Phone Post

caseharts -
Jack Brown -
Sir Psycho Sexy - Asked no tough questions. Phone Post 3.0

I just wanted to understand him - just as I have wanted to understand everyone else.   

Ttt but please ask tough questions. Phone Post

Doesnt Helwani get shit on for asking tough questions? Phone Post

Had Keith boxed? Phone Post

Kirik -


That was an enormously informative interview, and I am honored to have it posted on the UG.



For reasons I cannot explain, interviews are often looked and judged by the degree to which they are combative. Implicit in that point of view is that the subject of the interview is an adversary.



Keith Kizer is the most influential regulator in North America. That interview was a terrific window into his decision making.



For example, the story of how levels were set historically and going forward for acceptable levels of marijauna metabolites I don't believe had ever been told before, was very insighful.



Next interview I will demand that Jack ask the subject - right off the bat - "why do you hate America?" ;-)

That is if you can believe his answers Phone Post 3.0

Holy Shit. Nice score.