I guess it ended up getting pretty ripe??
Damn, I missed it.
You're talking about the good kind of ripe, right?
Tate got caught in the cloud too?!?!
demonbasketball04 - Tate got caught in the cloud too?!?!Pleeeasssseee yessssss
xtonyiscoolx -demonbasketball04 - Tate got caught in the cloud too?!?!Pleeeasssseee yessssss
not really. so far the only leaks are a bottom half with no nudity. basically just showing her thighs and side of her ass. nothing good sadly :(
my needle moved when i read the first thread but sadly it went back to 0 after some googling. heres to hoping there are some real good quality leaks. dont think id be able to leave the computer just be busy fapping
No truth to the rumour, so obviously the thread will get deleted.
The so-called 'leaked' pics are just some random woman with her leg exposed.
A template of a female leg. Nothing to see. shrugs
Anyone who posts an innapropriate pic of Tate, should one exist which is far from established, is banned for life from the site. What happened to those women is a despicable and illegal invasion of privacy.
Kirik -
Anyone who posts an innapropriate pic of Tate, should one exist which is far from established, is banned for life from the site. What happened to those women is a despicable and illegal invasion of privacy.
VTFU
Kirik -
Anyone who posts an innapropriate pic of Tate, should one exist which is far from established, is banned for life from the site. What happened to those women is a despicable and illegal invasion of privacy.
I have to agree with this 100%. I cant imagine if it was my friends or family having that happen to them.
Gilkuja - But candid pics of women in coffee shops and any other woman for that matter is still cool right?
Of course. How else would they sell blue names?
Gilkuja - But candid pics of women in coffee shops and any other woman for that matter is still cool right?
You really cant see the difference between private photos that were hacked and taking pics in public of a random girls ass?
blah blah blah - kirik.
Kirik -
Anyone who posts an innapropriate pic of Tate, should one exist which is far from established, is banned for life from the site. What happened to those women is a despicable and illegal invasion of privacy.
I have to respectfully disagree. The "cloud" is a communal network, and anyone sending, saving, uploading, downloading should be aware that anyone could view what they put into the cloud. Now, this differs from a phone call ,e-mail, text in the sense that they are sent directly to an individual- but even in that matter, when one gives a pictures to a second party, that second party could do whatever they want with it.
Lately Kirik I have been seeing a lot of things I find annoying about how you operate this website. It's apparent you're a person who will fall over to any person with money; this is clear in how you acted with the Lyyod Irvin scandal, the incident where a member hacked your site, and you were ok with it, and constant prohibiting of any anti-ufc and/or fighters comments. I think you could progress this site, and I hope you do.
Nothing personal, and my best regards,
Lay and pray
Kirik -As Kirik has a folder on his desktop labelled "tax return 2007" that contains the entire fappening
Anyone who posts an innapropriate pic of Tate, should one exist which is far from established, is banned for life from the site. What happened to those women is a despicable and illegal invasion of privacy.
Jimmy Wrassler -Kirik -
Anyone who posts an innapropriate pic of Tate, should one exist which is far from established, is banned for life from the site. What happened to those women is a despicable and illegal invasion of privacy.
I have to agree with this 100%. I cant imagine if it was my friends or family having that happen to them.
Were the people who posted in the "fappening" thread perma banned?
Gilkuja -Jimmy Wrassler -Its also no different than posting pics of your ex gf. Any time you post a picture of someone on a website without the subjects permission its a violation of their privacy. Doesnt matter if its Meisha Tate. I just dont like hearing someone try to be noble and caring for one persons privacy just because shes a celebrity.Gilkuja - But candid pics of women in coffee shops and any other woman for that matter is still cool right?
You really cant see the difference between private photos that were hacked and taking pics in public of a random girls ass?
No it isn't. If someone gives you a picture than you could do whatever you wish with that picture. Other than profiting off it ,if there are copyright issues', you could spread your picture and video all over the web.
AdmiralCackbar -Jimmy Wrassler -Kirik -
Anyone who posts an innapropriate pic of Tate, should one exist which is far from established, is banned for life from the site. What happened to those women is a despicable and illegal invasion of privacy.
I have to agree with this 100%. I cant imagine if it was my friends or family having that happen to them.
Were the people who posted in the "fappening" thread perma banned?
Of course I don't mean anyone who posted at all, but those who posted the pictures.
Yes, there would be no repercussions. Your girl might have the stigma of being a whore, but that doesn't negate the fact you have ownership (not sole ownership, and these rights would be protected for her as well) and are able to do with them as you please.
It's simple: no one is stealing anything- you would be showing people your sextape at your pleasure.
Jimmy Wrassler -Gilkuja - But candid pics of women in coffee shops and any other woman for that matter is still cool right?
You really cant see the difference between private photos that were hacked and taking pics in public of a random girls ass?
Like there aren't TONS of selfies of girls taken privately (probably often underage) posted on the OG from hacked Photobucket accounts etc.