Where does money come from, Salt?
Which elected official has the power to overrule the Federal Reserve?
But thanks for proving my point for me. Instead of learning something, make fun of those smarter than you! LOL
Salt the Snail -Nicely done.evil veiled - Too bad MMA fans are dumb as bricks and don't know the first thing about finance or geopolitics...
Good luck edumacating them Tim, God knows I tried!
The problem isn't that they are stupid, though, its that they think they are smart.
See, thats what being dumb means. Making fun of those smarter than you, and being able to laugh about it, instead of, you know, learning something.
Pop quiz, UG: Who is the current head of the Federal Reserve?
Ur mom faggit.
evil veiled - Too bad MMA fans are dumb as bricks and don't know the first thing about finance or geopolitics...Rothchild n Rockafeller
Good luck edumacating them Tim, God knows I tried!
The problem isn't that they are stupid, though, its that they think they are smart.
See, thats what being dumb means. Making fun of those smarter than you, and being able to laugh about it, instead of, you know, learning something.
Pop quiz, UG: Who is the current head of the Federal Reserve?
Spinning Shit -BobSalvage - Dick Cheney made money off the Iraq war.But can it burn hot enough to cause them to lose structural integrity?
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
Science experiment.
Test 1) Take a can, any old can will do. Throw some shit into the can that will burn. Set it on fire. Oh, cut the top of the can off first.
Test 2) Take the same can, punch some holes in the bottom of the can, throw some shit into the can that will burn, set it on fire.
Test 3) Take the same can, now put a fan, like a CPU fan, under the holes so it's blowing into the holes repeat other steps.
Test 4) Take same can, now throw gasoline into the can on top of all the other shit you are doing.
Jet fuel on it's own burns at a specific temperature. What happens when you are recreating essentially the same conditions that the can experiment does? The jet fuel in addition to significant air flow + a ton of shit to burn burns much, much hotter than it would if it was just jet fuel.
So the answer to your question is, yes, it can compromise steel beams.
AlbertEinstein - I consider all the elites to be leftists. If people are going to call libertarians right-wing or far right, which they do, then any statist authoritarians must be left-wing. That means Republicans and Democrats, i.e. the elite, are all leftists. I think it's a fair definition of the left. It matches up against the ideals the so-called right-wing republicans pay lip service to, although they don't actually care about them at all. But no one ever defines these terms before spouting off about them. In reality newspeak is in full effect and "right-wing" means different things to different people. It can be programmed in by the media. It means racist. It means nationalist. It means corporatist. It means national socialist. Wait what? It doesn't even make any sense.
This is some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard. The Democrats are not even left-wing. The party platform is left of the Republicans, but right of center.
There is no left wing mainstream political party in the USA.
Get out of your moms basement, travel, see what all the other left-wing political parties in other democratic countries actually look like.
Oh this is priceless, you think National Socialist is actually left wing?
You know that authoritarian governments like to throw words into their political party names to trick dumb-asses right?
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Look at that. We have 2 words that mean a type of democracy, and a third that can be construed as democracy! NORTH KOREA MUST BE THE MOST DEMOCRATIC NATION ON EARTH!
Socialism is by definition left wing. Adolf Hitler was diametrically opposed to Socialism and Communism. He launched a world war, wait for it, to rid the world of Jews, Communists and Socialists, oh and for land. He considered Jews and Bolshevism (commies and socialists) the enemy of civilization.
So the Socialist in National Socialism, isn't about Socialism. It's about hooking dipshits that look at the name and not the party platform.
Osbot -Nope.Spinning Shit -BobSalvage - Dick Cheney made money off the Iraq war.But can it burn hot enough to cause them to lose structural integrity?
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
Science experiment.
Test 1) Take a can, any old can will do. Throw some shit into the can that will burn. Set it on fire. Oh, cut the top of the can off first.
Test 2) Take the same can, punch some holes in the bottom of the can, throw some shit into the can that will burn, set it on fire.
Test 3) Take the same can, now put a fan, like a CPU fan, under the holes so it's blowing into the holes repeat other steps.
Test 4) Take same can, now throw gasoline into the can on top of all the other shit you are doing.
Jet fuel on it's own burns at a specific temperature. What happens when you are recreating essentially the same conditions that the can experiment does? The jet fuel in addition to significant air flow + a ton of shit to burn burns much, much hotter than it would if it was just jet fuel.
So the answer to your question is, yes, it can compromise steel beams.
Outlaw'd by Lytle -Osbot -Nope.Spinning Shit -BobSalvage - Dick Cheney made money off the Iraq war.But can it burn hot enough to cause them to lose structural integrity?
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
Science experiment.
Test 1) Take a can, any old can will do. Throw some shit into the can that will burn. Set it on fire. Oh, cut the top of the can off first.
Test 2) Take the same can, punch some holes in the bottom of the can, throw some shit into the can that will burn, set it on fire.
Test 3) Take the same can, now put a fan, like a CPU fan, under the holes so it's blowing into the holes repeat other steps.
Test 4) Take same can, now throw gasoline into the can on top of all the other shit you are doing.
Jet fuel on it's own burns at a specific temperature. What happens when you are recreating essentially the same conditions that the can experiment does? The jet fuel in addition to significant air flow + a ton of shit to burn burns much, much hotter than it would if it was just jet fuel.
So the answer to your question is, yes, it can compromise steel beams.
lol osbot has the backyard documents
Osbot -AlbertEinstein - I consider all the elites to be leftists. If people are going to call libertarians right-wing or far right, which they do, then any statist authoritarians must be left-wing. That means Republicans and Democrats, i.e. the elite, are all leftists. I think it's a fair definition of the left. It matches up against the ideals the so-called right-wing republicans pay lip service to, although they don't actually care about them at all. But no one ever defines these terms before spouting off about them. In reality newspeak is in full effect and "right-wing" means different things to different people. It can be programmed in by the media. It means racist. It means nationalist. It means corporatist. It means national socialist. Wait what? It doesn't even make any sense.
This is some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard. The Democrats are not even left-wing. The party platform is left of the Republicans, but right of center.
There is no left wing mainstream political party in the USA.
Get out of your moms basement, travel, see what all the other left-wing political parties in other democratic countries actually look like.
Thank you oh political God for defining for me where left, right, and center are, as if those terms have strict meanings that only someone as enlightened as yourself might begin to understand. I however prefer my own definitions because they are more consistent. Republicans and Democrats both support big government antiliberal policies and are therefore left wing to me. I don't care if you think some European or South American shithole is the REAL left. They can destroy their shitty countries however they want. I'm not interested in their idiotic policies. We have our own idiotic policies we need to put a stop to.
Yes the nazi party was clearly left wing, by my own definition and by any reasonable definition. I don't see how anyone can say otherwise. It seems to me they just say "no they were fighting communism." or "no they were racist/nationalist and that is right wing." If you say they were right wing then I would argue that term no longer has any meaning, as if the left cannot exist outside the cult of Marx. These definitions begin with the insane assumption that life cannot exist without overbearing governments, and so libertarianism cannot be either left or right wing. In that case I'm proud to say I'm neither left nor right, but people insist on saying it is right wing. But again the terms have no objective meaning and can be programmed into your brain.
“We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions”
– Adolf Hitler
AlbertEinstein -Osbot -AlbertEinstein - I consider all the elites to be leftists. If people are going to call libertarians right-wing or far right, which they do, then any statist authoritarians must be left-wing. That means Republicans and Democrats, i.e. the elite, are all leftists. I think it's a fair definition of the left. It matches up against the ideals the so-called right-wing republicans pay lip service to, although they don't actually care about them at all. But no one ever defines these terms before spouting off about them. In reality newspeak is in full effect and "right-wing" means different things to different people. It can be programmed in by the media. It means racist. It means nationalist. It means corporatist. It means national socialist. Wait what? It doesn't even make any sense.
This is some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard. The Democrats are not even left-wing. The party platform is left of the Republicans, but right of center.
There is no left wing mainstream political party in the USA.
Get out of your moms basement, travel, see what all the other left-wing political parties in other democratic countries actually look like.
Thank you oh political God for defining for me where left, right, and center are, as if those terms have strict meanings that only someone as enlightened as yourself might begin to understand. I however prefer my own definitions because they are more consistent. Republicans and Democrats both support big government antiliberal policies and are therefore left wing to me. I don't care if you think some European or South American shithole is the REAL left. They can destroy their shitty countries however they want. I'm not interested in their idiotic policies. We have our own idiotic policies we need to put a stop to.
Yes the nazi party was clearly left wing, by my own definition and by any reasonable definition. I don't see how anyone can say otherwise. It seems to me they just say "no they were fighting communism." or "no they were racist/nationalist and that is right wing." If you say they were right wing then I would argue that term no longer has any meaning, as if the left cannot exist outside the cult of Marx. These definitions begin with the insane assumption that life cannot exist without overbearing governments, and so libertarianism cannot be either left or right wing. In that case I'm proud to say I'm neither left nor right, but people insist on saying it is right wing. But again the terms have no objective meaning and can be programmed into your brain.
“We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions”
– Adolf Hitler
Kenny Florian said that sir.
A Little Secret About the Nazis
They were left-wing socialists. Yes, the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany, otherwise known as the Nazi Party, was indeed socialist, and it had a lot in common with the modern left. Hitler preached class warfare, agitating the working class to resist exploitation'' by capitalists -- particularly Jewish capitalists, of course. Their program called for the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, and other major industries. They instituted and vigorously enforced a strict gun control regimen. They encouraged pornography, illegitimacy, and abortion, and they denounced Christians as right-wing fanatics. Yet a popular myth persists that the Nazis themselves were right-wing extremists. This insidious lie biases the entire political landscape, and the time has come to expose it.<br /><br />Richard Poe, editor of Frontpage Magazine, sets the record straight:<br /><br />Nazism was inspired by Italian Fascism, an invention of hardline Communist Benito Mussolini. During World War I, Mussolini recognized that conventional socialism wasn't working. He saw that nationalism exerted a stronger pull on the working class than proletarian brotherhood. He also saw that the ferocious opposition of large corporations made socialist revolution difficult. So in 1919, Mussolini came up with an alternative strategy. He called it Fascism. Mussolini described his new movement as aThird Way'' between capitalism and communism. As under communism, the state would exercise dictatorial control over the economy. But as under capitalism, the corporations would be left in private hands.
Hitler followed the same game plan. He openly acknowledged that the Nazi party was socialist'' and that its enemies were thebourgeoisie'' and the plutocrats'' (the rich). Like Lenin and Stalin, Hitler eliminated trade unions, and replaced them with his own state-run labor organizations. Like Lenin and Stalin, Hitler hunted down and exterminated rival leftist factions (such as the Communists). Like Lenin and Stalin, Hitler waged unrelenting war against small business.<br /><br />Hitler regarded capitalism as an evil scheme of the Jews and said so in speech after speech. Karl Marx believed likewise. In his essay,On the Jewish Question,'' Marx theorized that eliminating Judaism would strike a crippling blow to capitalist exploitation. Hitler put Marx's theory to work in the death camps.
The Nazis are widely known as nationalists, but that label is often used to obscure the fact that they were also socialists. Some question whether Hitler himself actually believed in socialism, but that is no more relevant than whether Stalin was a true believer. The fact is that neither could have come to power without at least posing as a socialist. And the constant emphasis on the fact that the Nazis were nationalists, with barely an acknowledgment that they were socialists, is as absurd as labeling the Soviets internationalists'' and ignoring the fact that they were socialists (they called themselves the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics). Yet many who regardnational'' socialism as the scourge of humanity consider international'' socialism a benign or even superior form of government.<br /><br />According to a popular misconception, the Nazis must have been on the political right because they persecuted communists and fought a war with the communists in Russia. This specious logic has gone largely unchallenged because it serves as useful propaganda for the left, which needsright-wing'' atrocities to divert attention from the horrific communist atrocities of the past century. Hence, communist atrocities have received much less publicity than Nazi war crimes, even though they were greater in magnitude by any objective measure.
R. J. Rummel of the University of Hawaii documents in his book Death by Government that the two most murderous regimes of the past century were both communist: communists in the Soviet Union murdered 62 million of their own citizens, and Chinese communists killed 35 million Chinese citizens. The Nazi socialists come in third, having murdered 21 million Jews, Slavs, Serbs, Czechs, Poles, Ukrainians and others. Additional purges occurred in smaller communist hellholes such as Cambodia, Vietnam, North Korea, Ethiopia, and Cuba, of course. Communism does more than imprison and impoverish nations: it kills wholesale. And so did national socialism'' during the Nazi reign of terror.<br /><br />But the history of the past century has been grossly distorted by the predominantly left-wing media and academic elite. The Nazis have been universally condemned -- as they obviously should be -- but they have also been repositioned clear across the political spectrum and propped up as false representatives of the far right -- even though Hitler railed frantically against capitalism in his infamous demagogic speeches. At the same time, heinous crimes of larger magnitude by communist regimes have been ignored or downplayed, and the general public is largely unaware of them. Hence, communism is still widely regarded as a fundamentally good idea that has just not yet been properlyimplemented.'' Santayana said, Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'' God help us if we forget the horrors of communism and get the historical lessons of Nazism backwards.<br /><br />The Nazis also had something else in common with the modern left: an obsessive preoccupation with race. Hitler and his Nazis considered races other than their own inferior, of course. Modernliberals,'' who vociferously oppose the elimination of racial quotas, seem to agree. They apparently believe that non-white minorities (excluding Asians, of course) are inferior and unable to compete in the free market without favoritism mandated by the government. Whereas Hitler was hostile to those racial minorities, however, modern white liberals'' condescend benevolently. Hitler's blatant and virulent form of racism was eradicated relatively quickly and very forcefully, but the more subtle and insidious racism of the modern left has yet to be universally recognized and condemned.<br /><br />The media often focuses its microscope on modern neo-nazi lunatics, but the actual scope of the menace is relatively miniscule, with perhaps a few thousand neo-nazis at most in the United States (mostlytwenty-something'' know-nothings). The number of communists and communist sympathizers in the United States dwarfs that figure, of course -- even among tenured professors! And while the threat of neo-nazi terrorism is indeed serious, the chance of neo-nazis gaining any kind of legitimate political power anywhere is virtually zero. That is why the ACLU can safely use them to advertise its supposed commitment to free speech. Neo-nazi rallies incite violence, but they do not persuade bystanders to join their cause! If they did, the ACLU would have nothing to do with them.
Doesn't sound very right wing to me. Oh but they were racist and we all know only right wingers are racist right? Never mind the long history between the democrats and the KKK. And they fought other leftists! No way could leftists fight other leftists!
I'm just saying the common definition has no practical meaning. There is no real difference between Hitler and Stalin, but there is a huge difference between a free market capitalist society which allows people to create wealth compared to any of the various statist authoritarian economic models (socialism, communism, fascism, cronyism, etc.) which only institutionalize theft and destruction of wealth. As far as I'm concerned the latter are all left wing. But people twist words so they can say things like "Obama is really a centrist" as if it really means anything.
Why hasn't Kennedy fought in 18 months btw?
I just realized that Tim Kennedy has more military qualifications than Frank Castle, plus he's an mma fighter.
Rabid Bunyip - Why hasn't Kennedy fought in 18 months btw?Nm it's obviously a conspiracy
9/11 was an outside job!!! 9/11 was an outside job!!
Seriously though, it's crazy that some people still believe it was an inside job, it only excuses the governments failures and incompetence in preventing such a major, massive, insane attack. The Bush administration however took the attacks as an opportunity to invade Iraq even though they knew it had nothing to do with it and planned to invade other nations too and reshape the middle east but Iraq turned out to be a quagmire of epic proportions.
There's an infamous saying in politics (i think from Churchill) about not letting a crisis go to waste, as in, when shit hits the fan, take advantage of it rather than simply panicking and trying to fix it, and Bush led by his master Cheney, took advantage of it and the world is still paying the price and the latest chapter is ISIS and a weak, corrupt, barely functioning Iraqi state.
Outlaw'd by Lytle -https://youtu.be/FzF1KySHmUAOsbot -Nope.Spinning Shit -BobSalvage - Dick Cheney made money off the Iraq war.But can it burn hot enough to cause them to lose structural integrity?
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
Science experiment.
Test 1) Take a can, any old can will do. Throw some shit into the can that will burn. Set it on fire. Oh, cut the top of the can off first.
Test 2) Take the same can, punch some holes in the bottom of the can, throw some shit into the can that will burn, set it on fire.
Test 3) Take the same can, now put a fan, like a CPU fan, under the holes so it's blowing into the holes repeat other steps.
Test 4) Take same can, now throw gasoline into the can on top of all the other shit you are doing.
Jet fuel on it's own burns at a specific temperature. What happens when you are recreating essentially the same conditions that the can experiment does? The jet fuel in addition to significant air flow + a ton of shit to burn burns much, much hotter than it would if it was just jet fuel.
So the answer to your question is, yes, it can compromise steel beams.
Everyone knows 9/11 was an inside job.
The BigBadWolf ticket - So I guess he knows 9/11 was set up by the government to invade a country for its oil?Vtfu