My understanding of their intent with the uniforms is obviously to make it aesthetically pleasing. Instead of having walking billboards in the desert there would be a clear, symmetrical look to all of us.
Then we would have a limited space for our sponsors. If we're all wearing Under Armour, does that mean they're paying us? If I am a Nike sponsored athlete, and I'm wearing Under Armour fight shorts, you know...how does that work? Are they compensating me for damaging the deal to exclusively wear somebody else's stuff?
I don't know how this will all pan out. They could just come down and say, ‘I don't care who your other sponsors are. I don't care if you have an exclusive agreement. If you're going to fight, this is what I you're going to wear.' It's a scary road we're going to go down, but it has to happen. If we want to get paid like all the soldiers in other professional armed forces , then
we've got to look like it. 
1/10
Meh. You can do better.
I always bite on the thread title, but then I look at who posted it and click back.
Free bump for trying.
Half assed bro, didn't even play with the sponsor brands. Rush job or too sober.