macman1000 - Sounds like Bellator from what i heard.
yep
macman1000 - Sounds like Bellator from what i heard.
victorpoprock - LGSM, direct question- Is it Bellator?
LGSM has no idea of the detective skills i have!!!!!
ps. you are a great company from what i heard and i wish you all the luck in the world!!!
Jason,
to answer your question...my name is PRICELESS.
LGSM - I agree vengence, they want to own you and yet have no obligation to you.
It is your legacy, you build it and these promotions should showcase that not try to own people.
The funny thing about all of this is the way Bellator came on to the scene saying and doing all the right things and then BAM, they do the complete opposite. They stated the following reguarding the Strikeforce contract dispute with a few fighters.....
urdirt.com/2009/02/23/bellator-fc-willing-to-work-with-strikeforce/
victorpoprock - So does anyone know if alvarez signed this garbage?
Too late for them, I already have my name trademarked. :)
/
I cant imagine anyone would do that
That's insane.
I doubt the top guys signed with those clauses. They are all pretty smart about their business. Its the young up and comer that will be tangled in the web.
LGSM,
... another 'aspect' is the merchandising rights clause... they take all the rights they need under this agreement, and then apparently make you think you will get something back in a separate merchandising agt....
first/last right of refusal... matching right... wow...
I have often decried the fact that promotional agreements have been bastardized, unconscionably in my view, to put the Fighter in the position of service provider, when in fact it is the Promoter who is the service provider.
I would highly recommend that a fighter consider proactively trademark his name for himself - at the very least this raises a negotiating issue... the Promoter can not own the trademark if you already own it, so the parties will have to find a way to work through the issue. And even if you give the Promoter a license under your own trademark, via statute there are a number of rights/obligations that may work to your advantage (that you probably would not be able to negotiate for yourself)... so you may gain some (limited) protection.
Tahiti Bo - LGSM,
... another 'aspect' is the merchandising rights clause... they take all the rights they need under this agreement, and then apparently make you think you will get something back in a separate merchandising agt....
first/last right of refusal... matching right... wow...
I have often decried the fact that promotional agreements have been bastardized, unconscionably in my view, to put the Fighter in the position of service provider, when in fact it is the Promoter who is the service provider.
Tahiti Bo - LGSM,
... another 'aspect' is the merchandising rights clause... they take all the rights they need under this agreement, and then apparently make you think you will get something back in a separate merchandising agt....
first/last right of refusal... matching right... wow...
I have often decried the fact that promotional agreements have been bastardized, unconscionably in my view, to put the Fighter in the position of service provider, when in fact it is the Promoter who is the service provider.
I would highly recommend that a fighter consider proactively trademark his name for himself - at the very least this raises a negotiating issue... the Promoter can not own the trademark if you already own it, so the parties will have to find a way to work through the issue. And even if you give the Promoter a license under your own trademark, via statute there are a number of rights/obligations that may work to your advantage (that you probably would not be able to negotiate for yourself)... so you may gain some (limited) protection.
^^^^^^^Exactly what everybody should do if this is the direction our sport is going. I think it only cost like $125 to trademark your name and get a LLC filed.
LGSM -All of which is very simple, very low in legal fees, and in state filing and USPTO fees... well worth the protection.
I think if this is the sports new directions all fighters (big and small) should trademark their name, get a LLC filed and do everything in your power to protect and build the asset which is your name.
LGSM -Not sure what you mean by "buy" - you mean assign and/or license? I would think that it would be difficult to negotiate cash consideration for a license (and the Fighter would be crazy to assign the trademark). Likely outcome would be a royalty-free license under the trademark. The advantage here is not monetary (of course, it would be great to be able to squeeze out some $), it is the fact that the Fighter would have some comfort in falling back on statutory trademark rights with respect to the Promoter's use of the mark (esp. if it is an exclusive license) - things like quality control, &c.
I told the fighter the same thing file your own and if they want it they can buy it.
macman1000 - ^^^^^^^Exactly what everybody should do if this is the direction our sport is going. I think it only cost like $125 to trademark your name and get a LLC filed.Trademarks are $325 per class (number of clasess depends on how many different products/services you want to cover) if filed electronically, plus a couple hundred in legal fees if you have lawyer do it.
Tahiti Bo -macman1000 - ^^^^^^^Exactly what everybody should do if this is the direction our sport is going. I think it only cost like $125 to trademark your name and get a LLC filed.Trademarks are $325 per class (number of clasess depends on how many different products/services you want to cover) if filed electronically, plus a couple hundred in legal fees if you have lawyer do it.
LLC depends on state of filing, but is usually around $150, plus a few hundred in legal fees if you have a lawyer draft very simple operating agt, &c.
Bellator sounds really shady. Check out this article:
http://www.total-mma.com/2008/12/14/bellator-things-better-left-unsaid/