"When that One World Government will be used to reduce us all to a class of worker drones, while the elite live like kings and rule us, I dont think it's such a great idea."
Thats EXACTLY how it ALREADY is!! Bill Gates and Donald Trump rule on high, the masses work in Mcdonalds or some office.
One world government has advantages and disadvantages.
There are essentially 3 types of people making up the masses (this is a generalisation, but it will serve this purpose). Systems of control affect the 3 differently.
First type, I suppose, Criminals. I mean real low life nasty scumbag fucks! Rules will be in place that control them and stop them killing your family to steal your shit, killing you and raping your girlfriend, well, those are some good rules!!
In this case, totalitarian politics are quite cool! I mean, we have tons of imposing laws NOW, but these fuckers mess with people everywhere.
Second type, sheep. They are pretty much clueless, unless they are led to something and tiold what to do, they are lost! Absolutely cannot think for themselves, have zero confidence in their own abilities and need to be put in place A and told to do job B.
NWO, much like the current system, is an advantage to these guys! They are at their best as drones, if the One World Government creates jobs for them, it's an advantage.
Third type, feethinkers. I think if you read this, you probably fit into this category, but hey, it's freeTHINKER, it doesn't mean you are smart, gifted, it doesn't mean that you are going to do shit about it (generally you'll just get a job at the same place as the sheep and just bitch about how you should have it better while they get uncomfortable with your iconoclastic attitude). Also, it doesn't mean your ideas are even CORRECT!! it just means you came up with them by investigating alternatives and not accepting what is fed to you through official channels.
The one world government is seen as a bad thing by people of this disposition, too much centralised power, too much power for enforcement that is unchallenged. But I bet every penny I have that every free thinker would sell out to it if offered a cushy position of power, wealth and authority! (Sure, you'd like to think of yourself as 'special', like Luke Skywalker, or Neo or something, but that's inflated, almost dangerous, sense of self importance and ego masturbation).
I feel personally, the real danger of it is the orwellian police state that seems the logical progression. It's good at first because criminals disappear, and you feel safe in ways you never did before. But once they are gone what happens? Are those who were previously kept in check by criminals just going to fill their shoes? Or in the absense of real criminals, will the minor indiscretions of the rest of us now be considered seriously criminal?
Also, on censorship, what one person finds offensive, others may not. This is a problem we face now. Individuals deciding what the masses can and can't deal with.
It comes down to balance, how much is too much? who watches the watchers? Who polices the police? Are laws passed without dispute or is there still democratic process?
I think there are clues in our current model that paint an optimistic picture for a single world government, it revolves around the notion of countries having some individual leadership still, but otherwise governed as a whole. America has plenty of examples of why this could work, (I'm English btw), Governments often pass laws that individual states refute.
I'm just gonna stop now because I've FRAT'd