We all know Cecil People's is blind and retarded but your usually pretty good judge..
In your opinion why did Bisping deserve to win last night?
Just curious why you scored it as you did..
The fix was in.
I have wanted Cecil Peoples fired for a long long time now,and I do know that it was two judges last night that seem to be corrupt.I highly anticipate this answer myself.
TTT for a response.
ttt
TTT
ttt
Hello to everyone on the Underground. I have been reading the underground for years. I used to post quite a bit. Then I decided it would be better for me to stay out of all the arguments. I want to thank all of you guys for being so nice to me through the years. I have seen almost no negative posts about me here until now. I first started judging the UFC in 1996. I have been judging UFC almost twice as long as any other active judge. I am a former kick boxer and have been training grappling for 13 years. I am not here to argue with any of you or tell you that your opinion is wrong. I am only going to tell you why I judged the fight the way I did. Watch the fight again and turn off the sound. Commentary can color what you see. No doubt Hamill dominated the 1st. He hurt Bisping with a right hand right off the bat and again near the end of the round. He out scored Bisping and busted him up. It was a very impressive round for Hamill but still a 10-9 round. Not dominate enough for a 10-8. Watch the beginning of the second round closely. When Hamill throws the jab, Bisping slips the punch and hits him with his own counter jab. It is hard to see on camera because Hamill?s back is to the camera. His back was also to Goldie who was talking like the beginning of this round was like a continuation of the 1st. If you look you will see that Hamill is facing me giving me a clear view of what is landing. Bisping was landing the jab again and again and not getting hit. Hamill got 2 takedowns in rounds 2 and 3 but did very little with them. Bisping is using an active guard trying to turn for armbars and sweeps, Hamill is doing very little on top. Bisping is keeping him from scoring or improving his position. In the 3rd round Bisping actually lands more punchesd from the bottom than Hamill does from the top. In both the 2nd and 3rd rounds Bisping does more scoring. Striking. Under pride style scoring Hamill would have won. He did more damage, but it was all in the 1st round. By 10 point must system Bisping won the fight 2 rounds to 1 . 29-28 Bisping. Sometime the angle you see the fight effects your decision. That is why they put the judges on 3 different sides.
BY THE WAY MARIO YAMASAKI THOUGHT BISPING WON ROUNDS 2 AND 3 ALSO. MARIO WAS THE REF AND HAD A BETTER VIEW THAN ANY OF US.
I have never taken a payoff as some of you have suggested and never will. You may not agree with my decision but please don?t question my honesty.
Thank you
Jeff Mullen
LOL @ that pic..
Jeff, thanks for responding.. I have to admit I don't remember much about the 2nd round, will rewatch and get back to ya..
Just rewatched the 2nd and I still think Hamil won that
round.. was the more aggressive fighter, scored 2 take downs and landed the harder strikes.. the take downs while they weren't spectacular should score for something, considering that the ground and stand up were virtually even I'd have to say the take downs along with the aggression and ring control give the round to Hamil..
Just got around to this thread & wanted to thank Jeff for responding.I don`t own a Tivo so I can`t rewatch it.I for one want to say that I am not influenced by the announcers,and agree 100% with what Dan posted.I may have not seen the angle`s from the same camera as you,but I stand by my decision that Hamill won the fight.
Thank you once again for coming on Jeff to state your opinion.