<div class="Article" style="float: left;">
<table>
<tr style="vertical-align: bottom;">
<td>
<h3><a href="/go=news.detail&gid=353043" target="_blank">
Commercials sold out for UFC on FOX 1
</a></h3>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<a href="/go=news.detail&gid=353043" ><img class="photo" src="http://img.mixedmartialarts.com/method=get&rs=100&q=75&x=77&y=3&w=310&h=165&ro=0&s=cain-velasquez-jds-junior-dos-santos.jpg" /></a>
<strong class="ArticleSource">[mmafighting.com]</strong>
<div style="clear: both; line-height: 1px;height: 1px;"> </div>
</div>
<p><em>"We've gotten more credibility now because we're on FOX with all these big sports leagues. The fact these guys are reaching out to these other sponsors and they've had a great response is big not only for us, but for the fighters, too. This will trickle down to everybody. It's a big deal and yes, it's been great and it's only going to get better."</em><br />
-UFC president Dana White
Tickets have yet to go on sale for the UFC's maiden voyage on broadcast television, but the promotion can already boast a sellout in perhaps its most important indicator: television ad sales.
Just one month after the UFC and FOX announced its seven-year deal will begin with a Nov. 12 event at the Honda Center in Anaheim, California, the network has already sold out all of its existing commercial slots for the show.
The quick sellout is a positive sign that blue-chip, corporate sponsors are willing to test the waters.
"The pressure is on us to deliver," White said. "Meaning [it's on] us and FOX to put out an event that night like you've never seen when it comes to combat sports. [Velasquez and dos Santos] are going to do what they always do. They've been delivering for 10 years, and that's why we're sitting up here today."
RickMartelsArrogance - UG News: If we're not intentionally sexing up sensationalistic headlines that are misleading if not downright false, we're reporting on "news" that contributing members of the forum have already posted hours/days beforehand.
Hey, as long as it generates 1 or 2 more clicks on the homepage, it's all worth it right?
I guess we all know what Kirik and Chris' reputation are worth to them... a few cheap mouse clicks.
RickMartelsArrogance - UG News: If we're not intentionally sexing up sensationalistic headlines that are misleading if not downright false, we're reporting on "news" that contributing members of the forum have already posted hours/days beforehand.
Hey, as long as it generates 1 or 2 more clicks on the homepage, it's all worth it right?
I guess we all know what Kirik and Chris' reputation are worth to them... a few cheap mouse clicks.
Members upon members are utilizing this site for personal gain.The owners are no exception.
RickMartelsArrogance - UG News: If we're not intentionally sexing up sensationalistic headlines that are misleading if not downright false, we're reporting on "news" that contributing members of the forum have already posted hours/days beforehand.
Hey, as long as it generates 1 or 2 more clicks on the homepage, it's all worth it right?
I guess we all know what Kirik and Chris' reputation are worth to them... a few cheap mouse clicks.
I don't follow.
What was misleading about the headline?
Alternatively, where was this posted previously? 30% of the news that is put up is linked to existing threads, and does not generate a new thread. If something was posted previously, it was just missed is all.
