Ok you mouth breathers. Since many of you are retarded or are being intentionally obtuse, allow me to break this down for you. You seem to want to compare the three aforementioned fighters, and use Jones and Anderson as reasons Diaz is being treated unfairly. They are not comparable. Pay attention.
Anderson- Received one year for a first positive steroid offense. This is 100% standard. The only person I know of to be penalized more harshly was Schlemenko in Ca. Once again, one year. VERY standard. Everyone in Vegas who has tested positive, gets one year max, like Anderson.
Jones- NEVER tested positive IN COMPETITION. If you don't understand what in competition means, research it on many of the threads. Tested positive for coke out of competition. Was not penalized because they can't, just like Nick wasn't penalized for failing out of completion tests, per Cesar. His crimes weren't addressed by the commission, just like Nicks weren't.
Diaz- Tested positive in competition two times, ran from another drug test in CA, and then tested positive again. The AC stated they took his skipped test into consideration, so essentially they looked at the last as his 4th offense.
Nick was recently charged with 2 DUI's, driving on a suspended license, obstruction of justice, etc... He had 8 total charges and warrants for his arrest. NONE of that affected his UFC career. The commission did not get involved, just like they didn't with Jones. The UFC never suspended him or got involved. He was suspended, and excessively imo, for IN COMPETITION testing.
In closing, none of the above were penalized by the AC for their out of completion crimes/activities. If you want to say Nick's 5 years is excessive, I understand and agree. If you want to say weed should be legal, I agree. If you want to say the commissions testing was shady, I get it. But quit bringing up Anderson and Jones, as if they have anything to do with Nicks failures. It just makes you look uneducated or dumb.
