You're being civil. I was being "tongue in cheek", to overuse that phrase. Sorry if I seem confrontational but it's annoying to see several weeks of preparation and hours of free work belittled with a couple of "LMAO" and "that is probably the only positive thing about this seminar."
You've got a good point about time and experience. I worry a lot about that myself. My online persona may not show it but I put a lot of thought into whether or not I should be showing anything on the internet. I question whether I'm actually doing the right thing. "Don't these people have real instructors?"
I'll go back to what first made me start putting out tutorials. I was looking over BJJ.org at all of these tutorials by black belts and I thought "Man, they may be black belts but they fucking suck at taking a good photo."
That's what got me started. I figure if I can sit down and REALLY work out every detail, study how different black belts doing it, try it all myself, take clear photos, write thorough explanations, follow-up with Q&A, etc. then I'm doing a better job overall in this regard than a black belt who "knows" the move better. I think part of the reason people feel I'm just ripping off black belts is that I'm referencing them to show this isn't junk I pulled out of my ass -- good guys really do use this stuff.
What I do will never replace a qualified instructor. Anyone who comes to me without one has heard me stress over and over that they need to get to a real gym with an experienced teacher. Through what I've done online, I've gotten at least a dozen people to sign up at BJJ gym. I got one to do so at my seminar.
I'm going to be really, really cocky for a moment -- even more than usual.
Marcelo Garcia taught the reverse omoplata at the seminar I went to. The way he did it is fine, but not very detailed. I understand why he did it his way and nothing was "wrong" per se. But I think the way I teach it is better, since I really dig in and I can explain why you do everything you do. I'm sure Marcelo knows these details too -- but he didn't teach them.
That's some mighty big talk. I may have just made a fatal mistake and compared myself to Marcelo Garcia, which would be dumb since I can only dream of being at his level. What credentials do I have to make a claim like that? None really. So I may have just stepped on my own dick.
I just think I have the time to really go into details on it. That's what I went for at my seminar. Go into one thing I know well (or at least better than anyone else there). Ask Leo about it. I think he'll agree. He was at both seminars, so he saw it taught both ways.
Let's get into something really terrible here. What would you think of me teaching a white belt the reverse omoplata over the internet? There's no way that's a good thing. That violates everything we hold dear and true.
But as luck would have it, I have. Back when I was just a blue belt even. And here's what he has to say:
Aeso taught me the reverse omoplata over instant messenger and helped me troubleshoot problems I had with it. I've finished 4 tournament fights within the past year and a half (1 as a white belt and 3 as a blue belt) using the reverse omoplata.
Here are links to the two most recent RO wins in back to back fights at the Ontario Grappling Grand Prix Finals (June 2007).
Hard to argue with results.
I see where you are coming from. It's a legitimate concern to worry about sub-black belt instructors teaching. I can see the problems that can arise from that as well as you can. You're raising good points. Like I said, you're playing an important role in this discussion. It's just that I'm having trouble seeing any harm being done in this case.
Maybe I'm biased since it's my reputation at stake. But I have a hard time taking a broad, idealistic view of this when I see very real and tangible proof that people are better for me having done what I do.