Authority Figure - by the way, the whole point of this thread is index "shoe money" into Google. It's not about the discussion, whether this guy actually owns servers, or streaming tech, or knows jackshit about hosting a stream for 277K worldwide viwers. Its about what all his threads are about - using high traffic websites like the UG to index his name deeper and deeper into Google, which is a key element of his online business model. You guys are being duped. Hard body.
Excellent point. Request thread-deletion by moderator plz.
ShoeMoney - I dunno where all these shills are owning for saying there were hundreds of thousands of views. Issuing any 3rd party tool it looks more like 2k.
Anyway I will make the fight promotion a deal. My media company will provide all the bandwidth and servers for the next event if you allow us to disclose the numbers.
Authority Figure - by the way, the whole point of this thread is index "shoe money" into Google. It's not about the discussion, whether this guy actually owns servers, or streaming tech, or knows jackshit about hosting a stream for 277K worldwide viwers. Its about what all his threads are about - using high traffic websites like the UG to index his name deeper and deeper into Google, which is a key element of his online business model. You guys are being duped. Hard body.
He's just another SEO scammer who thinks hes in the business of internet marketing
If you knew anything about me you would know how anti guru SEO and all that other bullshit I am.
I have sold 4 companies for over 10m to date and continue to build services that people use.
ShoeMoney - I dunno where all these shills are owning for saying there were hundreds of thousands of views. Issuing any 3rd party tool it looks more like 2k. <br><br>Anyway I will make the fight promotion a deal. My media company will provide all the bandwidth and servers for the next event if you allow us to disclose the numbers. <br><br>Deal?
1. You don't currently have anything going on that's generating 2,000 visitors a minute for 4 hours straight, so why the fuck would they want to take a chance on you?
2. You're trying to use Invicta, like you used the UG for that retarded as contest. 'Cept, you're not big enough or important enough to get in bed with Invicta homie.
3. There is absolutely no legal means for you to determine how many ppl saw Invicta. Unless you're willing to admit to a crime, it would be better for you to just knock it off.
4. Who says they won't release #'s?
5. You can easily route 277,000 viewers through a third-party tool. If you went to the site of the company that hosted the event when their original servers went down, you can research their client list.
6. Troll harder. 2/10 (Would have scored higher if you were actually someone of consequence trying to call them out.)
Lol.
One property we have process over 2500 hits a second.
A company I owned in 2007 handled over 1200 hits a second making love calls to ebay displaying results. I sold te company in 2007 4 months after launch.
Search in tech crunch or any other site it's all documented.
I used Alexa's own reach database to look up their last numbers. They attained a reach of around .0055 for Invicta FC's first event. That represents 0.0055% of the world's 2.3 billion internet users. This translates roughly to 125,000 viewers by my math (about the same as the most watched UFC fight on Facebook ever). Alexa isn't perfect, much less for sites that low and the discrepancy can be considerably off due to the small sample size in those cases. I'm not sure what accounts for the discrepancy between the published number of unique IP addresses and the Alexa sample, even if they don't represent exactly the same things. 2k though? Don't be fucking ridiculous. You'd think an online advertising magnate would know better than that, and in fact I'm sure he does. I'm also sure someone with legitimate business skill would know better than to bash a company and call them liars as a means of making a business offer. So yeah, I'm pretty sure making a serious offer or making a serious speculation about Invicta FC's stream numbers were not the point of this thread.
ShoeMoney - I dunno where all these shills are owning for saying there were hundreds of thousands of views. Issuing any 3rd party tool it looks more like 2k. <br><br>Anyway I will make the fight promotion a deal. My media company will provide all the bandwidth and servers for the next event if you allow us to disclose the numbers. <br><br>Deal?
1. You don't currently have anything going on that's generating 2,000 visitors a minute for 4 hours straight, so why the fuck would they want to take a chance on you?
2. You're trying to use Invicta, like you used the UG for that retarded as contest. 'Cept, you're not big enough or important enough to get in bed with Invicta homie.
3. There is absolutely no legal means for you to determine how many ppl saw Invicta. Unless you're willing to admit to a crime, it would be better for you to just knock it off.
4. Who says they won't release #'s?
5. You can easily route 277,000 viewers through a third-party tool. If you went to the site of the company that hosted the event when their original servers went down, you can research their client list.
6. Troll harder. 2/10 (Would have scored higher if you were actually someone of consequence trying to call them out.)
Lol. <br><br>One property we have process over 2500 hits a second. <br><br>A company I owned in 2007 handled over 1200 hits a second making love calls to ebay displaying results. I sold te company in 2007 4 months after launch. <br><br>Search in tech crunch or any other site it's all documented. <br><br>So ya. I know what I am talking about
2K hits per seconds is not the same as 277K streaming simultaneously for 4 hours. It's not even close. You and I both know that you probably averaging between 2 seconds and 1 minuter per hit.
And let's be clear. You're not in the advertising business. You're in the spam business. While your business may not be legal, there is no rationale MMA promotion that's on the verge of a TV deal or PPV premier that would want to do business with you.
And again, you're lying. There are third-party streaming solutions that can handle 277K streamers. My suggestion is enjoy all the free advertising the UG continues to give you, for whatever reason.
and btw. Shoesomething - I happened to wake up 2 o'clock in the morning to take a piss and spent next 2,5 hours watching chicks fight. Then I checked my local mma forum, about 50+ dudes were watching invicta at 4 a.m. in european country you couldn't even tag on a map. So get the fuck out with your 2K views :D
Matt Phillips - This is how Shoemoney gets his followers on Twitter.
Yup one of the properties I own. We also have done promotions for LOTS of UFC fighters and recording artists to get the followers... and of course myself ;)
Chromium - I used Alexa's own reach database to look up their last numbers. They attained a reach of around .0055 for Invicta FC's first event. That represents 0.0055% of the world's 2.3 billion internet users. This translates roughly to 125,000 viewers by my math (about the same as the most watched UFC fight on Facebook ever). Alexa isn't perfect, much less for sites that low and the discrepancy can be considerably off due to the small sample size in those cases. I'm not sure what accounts for the discrepancy between the published number of unique IP addresses and the Alexa sample, even if they don't represent exactly the same things. 2k though? Don't be fucking ridiculous. You'd think an online advertising magnate would know better than that, and in fact I'm sure he does. I'm also sure someone with legitimate business skill would know better than to bash a company and call them liars as a means of making a business offer. So yeah, I'm pretty sure making a serious offer or making a serious speculation about Invicta FC's stream numbers were not the point of this thread.
