I don't remember everyone saying "Wow, that Kimbo guy is so tough, he could probably last 8 minutes with an amatuer boxer." As I recall, everyone thought he was invincible. Now that it's been proven that he's not, these squids are falling back on him being an "untrained" backyard fighter.
And of course every untrained backyard fighter is embraced by this forum, right?
So what is the Kimbo hype all about now? He fought a credible fight against a little-known MMA fighter and beat up a much smaller guy and knocked his eye out. Doesn't really seem to be that big a deal in the end, does it?
I will say that some of Liyon's post is true and makes sense. Kimbo was against many odds and fighting a bigger, better trained man. Kimbo put up a valiant fight and he is a very tough street-fighter.
That being said, Kimbo is used to doing to his unsuspecting and smaller opponents exactly what Gannon did to him. Kimbo was undoubtedly better trained and bigger than the guy who's ass he kicked in the infamous first Kimbo video. He took advantage of that situation by gouging the eye and beating the piss out of him.
All's fair in love and war....Kimb got BEAT. His cardio definitely came into play, but Gannon was gassed too. Doesn't matter how he got beat.... coulda, woulda, shoulda.... KIMBO WAS BEATEN AND BEATEN TO A 30 COUNT!
You can agree with some of Liyon's post and not be agaist Gannon. Gannons a badass. Liyon makes some legit points.
I cant stand when someone is so on one side of an issue they refuse to see other legit points. Its like when people talk politics, its like you dont have to be one extereme or the other.
You can still praise Gannon and agree with some of the points.