I think it's time for the UG to give the UFC brass some guidelines on how to create a PPV worth purchasing. This is just constructive criticism on how to improve the product. I understand we're not gonna get a loaded card every time under the global expansion model they're currently following but these rules can be easily followed. Before some of you get butthurt I'm not saying fights that don't fit these guidelines can't be exciting or interesting, but they would just be on the free prelim portion of the card or on a fight night.
1. No PPV fight should have 2 guys fighting who are both coming off a loss and ranked out of the top 10. (possibly top 15 for LW and WW)
2. No PPV should have 2 girls fighting outside of the top 5.
3. No PPV should have 2 BW or FW fighters matched up outside of the top 10.
4. All BW or FW title Fights or Women's title fights should be paired up w/ another title fight or another division's #1 contender fight.
Those are some guidelines I can think of off the top of my head, what would you recommend UG? Am I way off base w/ these guidelines?
Don't throw Bantamweight in there with Fly and WBW, BW is much deeper with nothing but world class, champion material fighters in the top 5. Cruz, Dillashaw, Barao, Faber, McDonald, Assuncao even Aljamain Sterling and Garbrandt on the way up.
Other than that not bad. 
IronWill - Don't throw Bantamweight in there with Fly and WBW, BW is much deeper with nothing but world class, champion material fighters in the top 5. Cruz, Dillashaw, Barao, Faber, McDonald, Assuncao even Aljamain Sterling and Garbrandt on the way up.
Other than that not bad.
I'm w you the BW top 10 is much more talented/interesting than FW. But all those guys you named are top 10 aren't they? Should #12 Iuri Alcantara v #13 Frankie Saenz be on a PPV? Could be a great, exciting fight, but should be on the prelims imo.