RICKSON'S BEST OPPONENT???

Funaki's a great fighter - no doubt, but much like many Pancrase fighters he really wasn't all that great when punches on the ground were allowed. Years of focusing and training a certain way can do that. When they allowed the more open MMA rules in Pancrase you can see the 'fish out of water' situation a few times. It's not quite like a jacketed BJJ champ taking off the gi and going NHB for the first time, but you can see a lot of floundering and people raining shots in those early bouts. Funaki's game from his back was solid early, but with striked involved he was only average. Years of taking slaps to the ears don't make for a long career either...especially when you fight every month for 4-5 years.

With ALL of that said, Funaki is still one of the best there has ever been at old shoot-style rules and it's too bad he didn't focus on the more open MMA rules earlier in his career. IMO he's EASILY the best opponent Rickson faced. Nakai is more talented, but when you're half-blind and outweighed by 30+ lbs. it's tough to do much...and I think he seemed to get really good AFTER that fight. Takada is probably next, along with Duarte, Zulu, or Yamamoto.

to put it simply, I feel Rickson lacked the same qualities to be a great MMA fighter that Royler does. Fact his stand up sucked. Can you imagine a current MMA fighter being frustrated because the other guy is grabbing onto the cage or ropes for like 10 minutes so you can't take him down? Someone like Yves Edwards would've kicked him right in the head or had enough power that when he was punching him he could actually hurt him. It's like when Royce was fighting Sakuraba, using those rabbit punch's. Another problem is his takedowns weren't that good. A sprawl and brawl fighter would've been hell for Rickson.

Yuki Nakai was the best, but far lighter than Rickson.

Winston Wolf is correct.