billyball2 - Osbot - gregbrady - Osbot - KnockoutThoughts -CloakedStar -KnockoutThoughts -How many of these boys tried to avoid key areas on this female to avoid being called perverts? How many took it easier on her than they would have on their male counterparts? An attractive female like that will have the dudes going soft, and trying their best not to grope titties..
Lol she won fair and square. It’s impressive but it’s at the 106 pound weight where girls have the most success. There’s a reason she’s the first to ever do it. Clearly this wouldn’t happen at any other weight but it’s still cool.
I’m not mad at her, but any man being honest with themselves knows a woman of equal weight doesn’t have the strength to compete with a man. That’s why I had a problem with that Fallon Fox dude exploiting the game the other way around. Men won’t compete against a female at the same intensity. It carries a negative stigma to go hard on a female. You win, and the guys treat you like a loser anyway.
It's not really that simple though. Since what you've said is quantifiably untrue. It's only true when you compare like for like regarding what percentile the respective athletes are. A 90th percentile male is stronger than a 90th percentile female, but at what point does that 90th percentile female perform better than a male? 80th? 70th?
Take Serena Williams in her prime. She's a more impressive physical specimen than probably somewhere around 90-95th percentile male tennis players. Yea, the top 250 beat her, but those guys are all top 1-2%'ers.
This young lady might be just a high performing female, who didn't run into a lot of deep competition at the miniature size that she competed at. This was at 1A, that's like graduating of what, 50?
You sound like that cuck conservative who complained about sword fighting in the Witcher "NO WAAAAMAN CAN EVER BEAT A MAN IN A SWORD FIGHT111111111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
read the study I posted
this is actually a scientific question and can be answered with the scientific method. most issues cannot
women are uch much weaker than men and their bones are much less dense. Of course these biological differences aren't just physical. there are differences in the femal and male brain.
humans have something called sexual dimorphism
Jesus christ you're dumb.
I don't deny or contradict ANY of this.
My point was to point out that a WORLD ELITE FEMALE, will SHIT on an above average male.
If you don't understand what I was saying, maybe you struggle with the word percentile. When you compare men and women, you should compare them at relative equivalent levels. That is called a percentile. A 90th percentile man, will almost certainly always out perform a 90th percentile female. Serena Williams is a 99.9999th percentile female athlete. Lebron James is a 99.99999th percentile male athlete. Joe the lumber guy, is a 50th percentile athlete. All the sexual dimorphism in the world isn't going to allow him to ever compete with Serena, in ANY athletic competition.
“Joe the lumber guy, is a 50th percentile athlete. All the sexual dimorphism in the world isn’t going to allow him to ever compete with Serena, in ANY athletic competition.”
I know we’re off the rails here, but you’re straying a little far from a point that I would usually agree with.
Joe the Lumber guy loses every time to a Serena IN TENNIS. He doesn’t lose to her every time in ANY athletic competition.
I’m Joe the Lumber guy. I played sports in high school and continued to remain athletic all my life. I competed in martial arts and play in town team sports. Serena would embarrass me on a tennis court, but baseball? Basketball? ANY combat sport? Cycling? I absolutely compete with or beat her all day every day.
The only reason you beat her in any of those sports, is if she has never played them. I'll concede this, if you're wiry, you might be better at endurance stuff than her where power to weight ratios matter, but any power/coordination sport? You ain't getting a sniff of that.
You know what the margine in athletic performance between an elite male and female is? ~10-15%. You're not 10% away from the best male cyclists in the world, best sprinters, basketball players, etc. Yes, there are sport specific builds/traits, but measuring strength vs strength relative to what a person is good at, a 50th percentile guy is never getting anywhere near a 90th percentile woman, let alone an 80th percentile woman.
Let's take a world heptathlete that played basketball. She beats the average man in everything, except, perhaps, raw strength, if the man is substantially larger. However, for those kind of events, where we have weight she's smoking the average, or even above average, or even "good" male athletes that are her size/weight.
Now, I'm not some SJW, I'm 100% against male->female trans competing with biological women, for all the reason's we've discussed. Sexual dimorphism is real, and there are unfair competitive advantages inherent to growing up as a man versus a woman that do not go away because you take away their testosterone. However, this only matters when the man is close enough in terms of potential to be competitive with elite women. The point is, not all men are equal in athleticism, neither are all women. The absolutely best women, are better than the vast majority of men, likewise, good men, are better than the vast majority of women in athletics.