Jose Aldo had the longest run, but the way he lost to Conor and Max 2x was pretty brutal
Volk 5 defenses, that one Max decision was super questionable, and he was KO’d pretty bad by Topuria
Max 3 defenses, fantastic resume’ and beat all the guys Volk did, but looked better doing it (in most cases) and lost his belt in the best possible way you can lose your title
Eh, but Volk beat those two in their primes. It’s more equivalent to Weidman. Do you rank him above Silva because he beat him twice or do you go with Silva because he did more overall and for a lot longer?
Or to go with your boxing theme, do you rank Jermain Taylor over Hopkins because he beat him twice, ignoring that Hopkins has a way better overall resume?
I was responding to the assertion that Anderson Silva should be somehow ranked all-time below Izzy because of their head-to-head fight in the twilight of Silva’s career.
I know. But all those examples are post prime vs. young, which of course can’t be counted the same way. Volk’s wins were prime, which gives him a better argument. That’s what makes this a tricky division to rank.
The Izzy-Anderson post was made in the context of the topic at hand. He was using it to say that head to head wins aren’t everything and that overall body of work has to be considered. It didn’t cross my mind that you didn’t understand that and were taking it literally .