kazja13 - I don't want owned. I want Cindy O to answer. Does UFC own tapout.
then I can put her answer on kazja13.com and then expose her credibility.
Kazja,
Your site is a joke and so are you. You have yet to back up a single point you have made that has been disputed by someone and all of your spamtastic rants over the years have made you look like a mentally ill fool.
Put THAT on your website;)
Cindy
It has just begun
You still haven't anwered my Question about Tapout. Why are you avoiding that Zuffa/Fertitta/Dana White/UFC own tapout/hitman.
I admitted you were an idiot because, yes, you are an idiot. You are worthless, Kazja, and you are the last person I would ever even consider confirming or denying a Zuffa related rumor for.
I read the other thread and you claim they made this purchase in 2001 and you have known about it for years. How come it's not common knowledge then?
Cindy
Could you imagine if it gets out. Affliction, Elite Xc, Dream, etc and all the UFC haters will ban Tapout/Hitman that is why it is not common knowledge.
CindyO - Oh, BS. None of those promotions existed in 2001... in fact, Elite and Dreams are circa 2007 and Affliction popped up in 2008.
Cindy
Kazja,
What's the matter, Kazja? Can't think of another BS excuse to explain your claim that the UFC has owned Tapout since 2001 yet no one knew about it but... YOU? LOL
(Here's your first one):
"Could you imagine if it gets out. Affliction, Elite Xc, Dream, etc and all the UFC haters will ban Tapout/Hitman that is why it is not common knowledge."
LMAO@ that stupidity since none of those promotions even existed until... 2007! Pfft!
kazja13 - Hey brain dead cindy. If they find out now the the UFC owns Tapout. Everyone knows they just began. Whew!
step to the left or your going to hit a tree. Duh!
Hey BRAINLESS... acquiring other companies is typically a sign of success so Zuffa would have released the news in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 or 2007 for the publicity had they bought Tapout in '01, dont you think???
If you disagree then explain how it was to Zuffa's benefit to keep it a secret.
They don't care what people think and they do exactly what they want to do. You're not the first opportunist (and an amateur one at that) trying to ride on Zuffa's coat tails and cash in on their success and I doubt you'll be the last.
Cindy
Also, you claimed YOU knew. How come you didn't "expose" them???
kazja13 - Hey brain dead cindy. If they find out now the the UFC owns Tapout. Everyone knows they just began. Whew!
step to the left or your going to hit a tree. Duh!
If you disagree then explain how it was to Zuffa's benefit to keep it a secret.
They don't care what people think and they do exactly what they want to do. You're not the first opportunist (and an amateur one at that) trying to ride on Zuffa's coat tails and cash in on their success and I doubt you'll be the last.
As the UFC becomes larger, the brand will lose some appeal to certain segments of the market, as it will be seen as to "cache." TapOut in particular developed their brand as the underground mixed martial arts brand. It would lose that "edge" if it was known it was just another Fertitta/White/Zuffa owned entity.
As well, if the ownership is in any way common, this becomes a way to hide compensation actually paid to "sponsored" fighters, yes? This has profound implications on the "market" if actual compensation remains unknown.
There are other reasons to keep the connection hidden.
kazja13 - Hey brain dead cindy. If they find out now the the UFC owns Tapout. Everyone knows they just began. Whew!
step to the left or your going to hit a tree. Duh!
If you disagree then explain how it was to Zuffa's benefit to keep it a secret.
They don't care what people think and they do exactly what they want to do. You're not the first opportunist (and an amateur one at that) trying to ride on Zuffa's coat tails and cash in on their success and I doubt you'll be the last.
As the UFC becomes larger, the brand will lose some appeal to certain segments of the market, as it will be seen as to "cache." TapOut in particular developed their brand as the underground mixed martial arts brand. It would lose that "edge" if it was known it was just another Fertitta/White/Zuffa owned entity.
As well, if the ownership is in any way common, this becomes a way to hide compensation actually paid to "sponsored" fighters, yes? This has profound implications on the "market" if actual compensation remains unknown.
There are other reasons to keep the connection hidden.